Method has too many lines. [12/10] Open
def load_deployment_config_files(deployment_name, deployers_config, enable_deployment_path)
enable_deployment_file = File.join(enable_deployment_path, ENABLE_DEPLOYMENT_FILENAME)
if File.exist?(enable_deployment_file)
deployers_config.load_configs
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
RootDeployment#initialize has boolean parameter 'fail_on_inconsistency' Open
def initialize(root_deployment_name, dependency_root_path, enable_deployment_root_path, fail_on_inconsistency: true, exclude_list: DEFAULT_EXCLUDE)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Boolean Parameter
is a special case of Control Couple
, where a method parameter is defaulted to true or false. A Boolean Parameter effectively permits a method's caller to decide which execution path to take. This is a case of bad cohesion. You're creating a dependency between methods that is not really necessary, thus increasing coupling.
Example
Given
class Dummy
def hit_the_switch(switch = true)
if switch
puts 'Hitting the switch'
# do other things...
else
puts 'Not hitting the switch'
# do other things...
end
end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 3 warnings:
[1]:Dummy#hit_the_switch has boolean parameter 'switch' (BooleanParameter)
[2]:Dummy#hit_the_switch is controlled by argument switch (ControlParameter)
Note that both smells are reported, Boolean Parameter
and Control Parameter
.
Getting rid of the smell
This is highly dependent on your exact architecture, but looking at the example above what you could do is:
- Move everything in the
if
branch into a separate method - Move everything in the
else
branch into a separate method - Get rid of the
hit_the_switch
method alltogether - Make the decision what method to call in the initial caller of
hit_the_switch
RootDeployment#overview_from_hash has approx 9 statements Open
def overview_from_hash(deployment_factory)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Method load_deployment_config_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_deployment_config_files(deployment_name, deployers_config, enable_deployment_path)
enable_deployment_file = File.join(enable_deployment_path, ENABLE_DEPLOYMENT_FILENAME)
if File.exist?(enable_deployment_file)
deployers_config.load_configs
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
RootDeployment has no descriptive comment Open
class RootDeployment
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.
Example
Given
class Dummy
# Do things...
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)
Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:
# The Dummy class is responsible for ...
class Dummy
# Do things...
end
RootDeployment#extract_deployment performs a nil-check Open
raise "cannot extract deployment #{name} from overview" if details.nil?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
A NilCheck
is a type check. Failures of NilCheck
violate the "tell, don't ask" principle.
Additionally, type checks often mask bigger problems in your source code like not using OOP and / or polymorphism when you should.
Example
Given
class Klass
def nil_checker(argument)
if argument.nil?
puts "argument isn't nil!"
end
end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[3]:Klass#nil_checker performs a nil-check. (NilCheck)
RootDeployment#load_deployment_config_files has the variable name 'e' Open
rescue RuntimeError => e
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.