ory-am/hydra

View on GitHub
internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Method MetadataAPIService.IsReadyExecute has 64 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (a *MetadataAPIService) IsReadyExecute(r ApiIsReadyRequest) (*IsReady200Response, *http.Response, error) {
    var (
        localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
        localVarPostBody    interface{}
        formFiles           []formFile
Severity: Minor
Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go - About 1 hr to fix

    Method MetadataAPIService.IsAliveExecute has 64 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (a *MetadataAPIService) IsAliveExecute(r ApiIsAliveRequest) (*HealthStatus, *http.Response, error) {
        var (
            localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
            localVarPostBody    interface{}
            formFiles           []formFile
    Severity: Minor
    Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go - About 1 hr to fix

      Method MetadataAPIService.GetVersionExecute has 54 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (a *MetadataAPIService) GetVersionExecute(r ApiGetVersionRequest) (*GetVersion200Response, *http.Response, error) {
          var (
              localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
              localVarPostBody    interface{}
              formFiles           []formFile
      Severity: Minor
      Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go - About 1 hr to fix

        Method MetadataAPIService.IsReadyExecute has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
        Open

        func (a *MetadataAPIService) IsReadyExecute(r ApiIsReadyRequest) (*IsReady200Response, *http.Response, error) {
            var (
                localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
                localVarPostBody    interface{}
                formFiles           []formFile
        Severity: Major
        Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go - About 50 mins to fix

          Method MetadataAPIService.IsAliveExecute has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
          Open

          func (a *MetadataAPIService) IsAliveExecute(r ApiIsAliveRequest) (*HealthStatus, *http.Response, error) {
              var (
                  localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
                  localVarPostBody    interface{}
                  formFiles           []formFile
          Severity: Major
          Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go - About 50 mins to fix

            Method MetadataAPIService.GetVersionExecute has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
            Open

            func (a *MetadataAPIService) GetVersionExecute(r ApiGetVersionRequest) (*GetVersion200Response, *http.Response, error) {
                var (
                    localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
                    localVarPostBody    interface{}
                    formFiles           []formFile
            Severity: Major
            Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go - About 45 mins to fix

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

              func (a *MetadataAPIService) IsReadyExecute(r ApiIsReadyRequest) (*IsReady200Response, *http.Response, error) {
                  var (
                      localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
                      localVarPostBody    interface{}
                      formFiles           []formFile
              Severity: Major
              Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
              internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go on lines 165..246

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 657.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

              func (a *MetadataAPIService) IsAliveExecute(r ApiIsAliveRequest) (*HealthStatus, *http.Response, error) {
                  var (
                      localVarHTTPMethod  = http.MethodGet
                      localVarPostBody    interface{}
                      formFiles           []formFile
              Severity: Major
              Found in internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
              internal/httpclient/api_metadata.go on lines 282..363

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 657.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              There are no issues that match your filters.

              Category
              Status