Showing 17 of 17 total issues
Function createRequestFactory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const createRequestFactory = findMountpoint => (getter, method, readOnly, respond) => async (req, res) => {
const call = async (target, rest, options) => {
const found = await findMountpoint(target);
const attributes = found.mount.attributes || {};
const strict = attributes.strictGroups !== false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 129 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = (core) => {
const wrapper = (method, cb, ...args) => vfs => (file, options = {}) => {
const promise = Promise.resolve(getRealPath(core, options.session, vfs.mount, file))
.then(realPath => fs[method](realPath, ...args));
Function createRequestFactory
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const createRequestFactory = findMountpoint => (getter, method, readOnly, respond) => async (req, res) => {
const call = async (target, rest, options) => {
const found = await findMountpoint(target);
const attributes = found.mount.attributes || {};
const strict = attributes.strictGroups !== false;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Promise.resolve(getRealPath(core, options.session, vfs.mount, file))
.then(realPath => fs.stat(realPath).then(stat => ({realPath, stat})))
.then(({realPath, stat}) => {
if (!stat.isFile()) {
return false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Promise.resolve(getRealPath(core, options.session, vfs.mount, root))
.then(realPath => fs.readdir(realPath).then(files => ({realPath, files})))
.then(({realPath, files}) => {
const promises = files.map(f => createFileIter(core, realPath, root.replace(/\/?$/, '/') + f));
return Promise.all(promises);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function call
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const call = async (target, rest, options) => {
const found = await findMountpoint(target);
const attributes = found.mount.attributes || {};
const strict = attributes.strictGroups !== false;
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = (core) => {
const wrapper = (method, cb, ...args) => vfs => (file, options = {}) => {
const promise = Promise.resolve(getRealPath(core, options.session, vfs.mount, file))
.then(realPath => fs[method](realPath, ...args));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
this.adapter = this.options.adapter(core, this.options.config);
} catch (e) {
this.core.logger.warn(e);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
this.adapter = this.options.adapter(core, this.options.config);
} catch (e) {
this.core.logger.warn(e);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function initSocketRoutes
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
initSocketRoutes() {
const {app} = this.core;
app.ws('/', (ws, req) => {
ws.upgradeReq = ws.upgradeReq || req;
Function initService
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
initService() {
const {app} = this.core;
const {requireAllGroups} = this.core.configuration.auth;
const middleware = {
Function exports
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = core => {
const router = express.Router();
const methods = vfs(core);
const middleware = createMiddleware(core);
const {isAuthenticated} = core.make('osjs/express');
Function listen
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async listen() {
const httpPort = this.config('port');
const httpHost = this.config('bind');
const wsPort = this.config('ws.port') || httpPort;
const pub = this.config('public');
Function onDone
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const onDone = (req, res) => {
if (req.files) {
for (let fieldname in req.files) {
try {
const n = req.files[fieldname].path;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function destroy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async destroy(done = () => {}) {
if (this.destroyed) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createCrossRequestFactory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const createCrossRequestFactory = findMountpoint => (getter, method, respond) => async (req, res) => {
const [from, to, options] = [...getter(req, res), createOptions(req)];
const srcMount = await findMountpoint(from);
const destMount = await findMountpoint(to);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const createOptions = req => {
const options = req.fields.options;
const range = req.headers && req.headers.range;
const session = {...req.session || {}};
let result = options || {};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"