Sign upLogin

osbridge/openconferenceware

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 90 of 90 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  slots << [10.hours, 11.hours, 13.hours + 30.minutes, 14.hours + 30.minutes, 15.hours + 45.minutes, 16.hours + 45.minutes].map{|offset| e.dates[0] + offset}
Severity: Minor
Found in util/seed_schedule.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
util/seed_schedule.rb on lines 10..10

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 36.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  slots << [10.hours, 11.hours, 13.hours + 30.minutes, 14.hours + 30.minutes, 15.hours + 45.minutes, 16.hours + 45.minutes].map{|offset| e.dates[2] + offset}
Severity: Minor
Found in util/seed_schedule.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
util/seed_schedule.rb on lines 8..8

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 36.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method index has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def index
      @comments = Comment.listable
      add_breadcrumb "Comments", comments_path()

      if [:atom, :json, :xml].include?(request.format.to_sym)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/comments_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize(start_time, end_time=nil, opts=nil)
      # Initialize with a single DateTime, a pair of DateTimes,
      # or an object that responds_to start_time and end_time, and
      # several options
      #
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/open_conference_ware/time_range_helper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method get_proposal_and_assignment_status has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_proposal_and_assignment_status
      if proposal = Proposal.find(params[:id].to_i) rescue nil
        if proposal.event
          return [proposal, :assigned_via_param]
        else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/proposals_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method sort_link_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def sort_link_for(label, field, kind=nil)
      kind ||= @kind

      opts = {sort: field}
      opts[:dir] = 'desc' if ( field == params[:sort] && params[:dir] != 'desc' )
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/open_conference_ware/proposals_helper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method allocate_rooms has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def allocate_rooms
    @sessions.each do |session|
      next if session.room.present?
      first_available_room = @rooms.find{|room| room_available_at?(room, session.start_time)}
      if first_available_room.present?
Severity: Minor
Found in util/assign_rooms.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          @proposal.valid? if params[:preview]
          format.html { render action: "new" }
          format.xml  { render xml: @proposal.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
          format.json { render json: @proposal.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/proposals_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
app/controllers/open_conference_ware/proposals_controller.rb on lines 273..277

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          @proposal.valid? if params[:preview]

          format.html { render action: "edit" }
          format.xml  { render xml: @proposal.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
          format.json { render json: @proposal.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/proposals_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
app/controllers/open_conference_ware/proposals_controller.rb on lines 222..225

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

        return false
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/application_controller.rb - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this method.
    Open

          return [nil, :empty]
    Severity: Major
    Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/application_controller.rb - About 30 mins to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def notify_rejected_speakers
      if rejected?
        if !notified_at
          SpeakerMailer.speaker_rejected_email(self).deliver
          self.notified_at = Time.now
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/open_conference_ware/proposal.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
      app/models/open_conference_ware/proposal.rb on lines 621..632

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 32.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def notify_accepted_speakers
      if accepted?
        if !notified_at
          SpeakerMailer.speaker_accepted_email(self).deliver
          self.notified_at = Time.now
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/open_conference_ware/proposal.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
      app/models/open_conference_ware/proposal.rb on lines 636..647

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 32.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Method assert_accepting_proposals has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def assert_accepting_proposals
      unless accepting_proposals? || admin?
        flash[:failure] = Snippet.content_for(:proposals_not_accepted_error)
        redirect_to @event ? event_proposals_path(@event) : proposals_path
      end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/proposals_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method validate_url_attribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def validate_url_attribute(*attributes)
        valid = true
        for attribute in [attributes].flatten
          value = self.read_attribute(attribute)
          next if value.blank?
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/mixins/open_conference_ware/normalize_url_mixin.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method get_content has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def get_content
    if self.page.exists?
      if self.page.content.kind_of?(Hash) and value = self.page.content['content']
        return value
      else
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/rwikibot_page_drone.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method overlaps? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def overlaps?(object)
      raise ArgumentError unless object.respond_to?(:start_time) && object.respond_to?(:end_time)
      if self.start_time != self.end_time && object.start_time != object.end_time
        (self.start_time.to_i..self.end_time.to_i).overlaps?(object.start_time.to_i..object.end_time.to_i) && (self.end_time != object.start_time && self.start_time != object.end_time)
      else
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/mixins/open_conference_ware/schedule_overlaps_mixin.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method snippet_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def snippet_for(slug, use_simple_format=true)
      record = snippet_record_for(slug)
      string = record.content
      if admin?
        if matcher = string.match(%r{(.+)(</(?:div|p)>)\s*$}s)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/helpers/open_conference_ware/snippets_helper.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def index
      @schedule_items = @event.schedule_items.order('start_time ASC')

      respond_to do |format|
        format.html # index.html.erb
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/schedule_items_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
      app/controllers/open_conference_ware/tracks_controller.rb on lines 12..18

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 27.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def index
      @tracks = @event.tracks.order("title ASC")

      respond_to do |format|
        format.html # index.html.erb
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/open_conference_ware/tracks_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
      app/controllers/open_conference_ware/schedule_items_controller.rb on lines 12..18

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 27.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language