Method collect_update_multiple_results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_update_multiple_results
TagSet::TAG_TYPES_INITIALIZABLE.each do |tag_type|
@approve[tag_type] = []
@synonym[tag_type] = []
@reject[tag_type] = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setup_for_review
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_for_review
set_limit
@nom_limit = 30
@nominations = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
@nominations_count = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_multiple
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_multiple
unless @tag_set.user_is_moderator?(current_user)
flash[:error] = ts("You don't have permission to do that.")
redirect_to tag_set_path(@tag_set) and return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File tag_set_nominations_controller.rb
has 298 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TagSetNominationsController < ApplicationController
cache_sweeper :tag_set_sweeper
before_action :users_only
before_action :load_tag_set, except: [ :index ]
Class TagSetNominationsController
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TagSetNominationsController < ApplicationController
cache_sweeper :tag_set_sweeper
before_action :users_only
before_action :load_tag_set, except: [ :index ]
Method update_multiple
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_multiple
unless @tag_set.user_is_moderator?(current_user)
flash[:error] = ts("You don't have permission to do that.")
redirect_to tag_set_path(@tag_set) and return
end
Method collect_update_multiple_results
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_update_multiple_results
TagSet::TAG_TYPES_INITIALIZABLE.each do |tag_type|
@approve[tag_type] = []
@synonym[tag_type] = []
@reject[tag_type] = []
Method setup_for_review
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_for_review
set_limit
@nom_limit = 30
@nominations = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
@nominations_count = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
if params[:user_id]
@user = User.find_by(login: params[:user_id])
if @user != current_user
flash[:error] = ts("You can only view your own nominations, sorry.")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
render_index_on_error and return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
redirect_to tag_set_nominations_path(@tag_set) and return
Method check_pseud_ownership
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_pseud_ownership
if !tag_set_nomination_params[:pseud_id].blank?
pseud = Pseud.find(tag_set_nomination_params[:pseud_id])
unless pseud && current_user && current_user.pseuds.include?(pseud)
flash[:error] = ts("You can't nominate tags with that pseud.")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_nomination
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_nomination
@tag_set_nomination = @tag_set.tag_set_nominations.find_by(id: params[:id])
unless @tag_set_nomination
flash[:error] = ts("Which nominations did you want to work with?")
redirect_to tag_set_path(@tag_set) and return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
pseud = Pseud.find(tag_set_nomination_params[:pseud_id])
unless pseud && current_user && current_user.pseuds.include?(pseud)
flash[:error] = ts("You can't nominate tags with that pseud.")
redirect_to root_path and return
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76