outcastgeek/jrzmq

View on GitHub

Showing 16 of 16 total issues

Method recv has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def recv reply
    if reply and @reply_to
      reply = reply.is_a?(Array) ? [@reply_to, ''].concat(reply) : [@reply_to, '', reply]
      send_to_broker MDP::W_REPLY, nil, reply
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in zguide/mdwrkapi.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method recv has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def recv reply
    if reply and @reply_to
      reply = reply.is_a?(Array) ? [@reply_to, ''].concat(reply) : [@reply_to, '', reply]
      send_to_broker MDP::W_REPLY, nil, reply
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in zguide/mdwrkapi.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method mediate has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def mediate
        #count = 0
        loop do
          #puts "mediate: count: #{count}"
          #count += 1
    Severity: Minor
    Found in zguide/mdbroker.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method mediate has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def mediate
        #count = 0
        loop do
          #puts "mediate: count: #{count}"
          #count += 1
    Severity: Minor
    Found in zguide/mdbroker.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method process_worker has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def process_worker address, message
          command = message.pop_string #message.shift
      
          worker_exists = @workers[address]
          worker = require_worker address
      Severity: Minor
      Found in zguide/mdbroker.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method process_worker has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def process_worker address, message
            command = message.pop_string #message.shift
        
            worker_exists = @workers[address]
            worker = require_worker address
        Severity: Minor
        Found in zguide/mdbroker.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method s_dump has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def s_dump(sock)
          puts "------------------------------------"
          # Build an array to hold all the parts
          messages = []
          zmsg = sock.recv
        Severity: Minor
        Found in guide/zhelpers.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method s_dump has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def s_dump(sock)
          puts "------------------------------------"
          # Build an array to hold all the parts
          messages = []
          zmsg = sock.recv
        Severity: Minor
        Found in zguide/zhelpers.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

          messages.each do |msg|
            if msg == messages[0]
              # identity - Naive implementation
              msg.size == 17 ? puts("Identity: #{msg.to_s.unpack('H*')[0]}") : puts("Identity: #{msg.to_s}")
            else
        Severity: Minor
        Found in guide/zhelpers.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
        zguide/zhelpers.rb on lines 11..17

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 34.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

          messages.each do |msg|
            if msg == messages[0]
              # identity - Naive implementation
              msg.size == 17 ? puts("Identity: #{msg.to_s.unpack('H*')[0]}") : puts("Identity: #{msg.to_s}")
            else
        Severity: Minor
        Found in zguide/zhelpers.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
        guide/zhelpers.rb on lines 12..18

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 34.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Method service_success has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def service_success client, uuid
          # Attempt to process a single request, return True if successful
          return true unless File.exist?(request_filename(uuid))
        
          request = JSON.parse(File.read(request_filename(uuid)))
        Severity: Minor
        Found in zguide/titanic.rb - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method send has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def send(message)
            @retries.times do |tries|
              raise("Send: #{message} failed") unless @socket.send(message)
              if ZMQ.poll([ZMQ::PollItem.new(@socket, ZMQ::POLLIN)], @timeout)
                yield @socket.recv
        Severity: Minor
        Found in guide/lpclient.rb - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def step2(context)
          # Bind inproc socket before starting step1
          receiver = context.socket(ZMQ::PAIR)
          receiver.bind("inproc://step2")
          Thread.new{step1(context)}
        Severity: Minor
        Found in zguide/mtrelay.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        guide/mtrelay.rb on lines 16..28

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 29.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def step2(context)
          # Bind inproc socket before starting step1
          receiver = context.socket(ZMQ::PAIR)
          receiver.bind("inproc://step2")
          Thread.new{step1(context)}
        Severity: Minor
        Found in guide/mtrelay.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        zguide/mtrelay.rb on lines 15..27

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 29.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def worker_routine(context)
          # Socket to talk to dispatcher
          receiver = context.socket(ZMQ::REP)
          receiver.connect("inproc://workers")
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in zguide/mtserver.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
        guide/mtserver.rb on lines 9..20

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 27.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def worker_routine(context)
          # Socket to talk to dispatcher
          receiver = context.socket(ZMQ::REP)
          receiver.connect("inproc://workers")
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in guide/mtserver.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
        zguide/mtserver.rb on lines 8..19

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 27.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language