File DefaultShareProvider.php
has 866 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* @author Björn Schießle <bjoern@schiessle.org>
* @author Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
* @author phisch <git@philippschaffrath.de>
Function getSharedWith
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSharedWith($userId, $shareType, $node, $limit, $offset) {
/** @var Share[] $shares */
$shares = [];
if ($shareType === \OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_USER) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
DefaultShareProvider
has 31 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DefaultShareProvider implements IShareProvider {
// Special share type for user modified group shares
public const SHARE_TYPE_USERGROUP = 2;
/** @var IDBConnection */
Function getAllSharedWith
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getAllSharedWith($userId, $node) {
// Create array of sharedWith objects (target user -> $userId or group of which user is a member
$user = $this->userManager->get($userId);
// Check if user is member of some groups and chunk them
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function update(\OCP\Share\IShare $share) {
$this->validate($share);
$shareAttributes = $this->formatShareAttributes(
$share->getAttributes()
Method create
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create(\OCP\Share\IShare $share) {
$this->validate($share);
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->insert('share');
Method updateForRecipient
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function updateForRecipient(\OCP\Share\IShare $share, $recipient) {
if ($share->getShareType() === \OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_USER) {
if ($share->getSharedWith() !== $recipient) {
throw new ProviderException('Recipient does not match');
}
Method getSharedWith
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSharedWith($userId, $shareType, $node, $limit, $offset) {
/** @var Share[] $shares */
$shares = [];
if ($shareType === \OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_USER) {
Method getAllSharedWith
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getAllSharedWith($userId, $node) {
// Create array of sharedWith objects (target user -> $userId or group of which user is a member
$user = $this->userManager->get($userId);
// Check if user is member of some groups and chunk them
Method getShareById
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getShareById($id, $recipientId = null) {
if (!ctype_digit($id)) {
// share id is defined as a field of type integer
// if someone calls the API asking for a share id like "abc"
// then there is no point trying to query the database,
Method userDeleted
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function userDeleted($uid, $shareType) {
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->delete('share');
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create(\OCP\Share\IShare $share) {
$this->validate($share);
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->insert('share');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getAllSharesBy
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getAllSharesBy($userId, $shareTypes, $nodeIDs, $reshares) {
$shares = [];
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->select('*')
Method resolveGroupShares
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function resolveGroupShares($shares, $userId) {
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
list($chunkedShareIds, $shareIdToShareMap) = $this->chunkSharesToMaps($shares);
foreach ($chunkedShareIds as $shareIdsChunk) {
Method getSharesBy
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSharesBy($userId, $shareType, $node, $reshares, $limit, $offset) {
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->select('*')
->from('share')
->andWhere($qb->expr()->orX(
Function updateForRecipient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function updateForRecipient(\OCP\Share\IShare $share, $recipient) {
if ($share->getShareType() === \OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_USER) {
if ($share->getSharedWith() !== $recipient) {
throw new ProviderException('Recipient does not match');
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createShare
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function createShare($data) {
$share = new Share($this->rootFolder, $this->userManager);
$share->setId($data['id'])
->setShareType((int)$data['share_type'])
->setPermissions((int)$data['permissions'])
Function resolveGroupShares
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function resolveGroupShares($shares, $userId) {
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
list($chunkedShareIds, $shareIdToShareMap) = $this->chunkSharesToMaps($shares);
foreach ($chunkedShareIds as $shareIdsChunk) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getSharedWithUserGroupQuery
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getSharedWithUserGroupQuery($groups, $userId, $node) {
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->select('s.*', 'f.fileid', 'f.path')
->selectAlias('st.id', 'storage_string_id')
->from('share', 's')
Method getSharesWithInvalidFileid
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSharesWithInvalidFileid(int $limit) {
$validShareTypes = [
\OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_USER,
\OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_GROUP,
\OCP\Share::SHARE_TYPE_LINK,
Method getChildren
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getChildren(\OCP\Share\IShare $parent) {
$children = [];
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->select('*')
Method getSharesBy
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSharesBy($userId, $shareType, $node, $reshares, $limit, $offset) {
Function getShareById
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getShareById($id, $recipientId = null) {
if (!ctype_digit($id)) {
// share id is defined as a field of type integer
// if someone calls the API asking for a share id like "abc"
// then there is no point trying to query the database,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getSharedWith
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSharedWith($userId, $shareType, $node, $limit, $offset) {
Function getAllSharesBy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getAllSharesBy($userId, $shareTypes, $nodeIDs, $reshares) {
$shares = [];
$qb = $this->dbConn->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->select('*')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$qb->update('share')
->where($qb->expr()->eq('id', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getId())))
->set('share_with', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getSharedWith()))
->set('uid_owner', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getShareOwner()))
->set('uid_initiator', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getSharedBy()))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$qb->update('share')
->where($qb->expr()->eq('id', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getId())))
->set('share_with', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getPassword()))
->set('uid_owner', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getShareOwner()))
->set('uid_initiator', $qb->createNamedParameter($share->getSharedBy()))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$qb = $qb->select('s.*')
->from('share', 's')
->leftJoin('s', 'filecache', 'f', $qb->expr()->eq('s.file_source', 'f.fileid'))
->where($qb->expr()->isNull('f.fileid'))
->andWhere(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($reshares === false) {
$qb->andWhere($qb->expr()->eq('uid_initiator', $qb->createNamedParameter($userId)));
} else {
$qb->andWhere(
$qb->expr()->orX(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($reshares === false) {
$qb->andWhere($qb->expr()->eq('uid_initiator', $qb->createNamedParameter($userId)));
} else {
$qb->andWhere(
$qb->expr()->orX(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$qb->select('s.*', 'f.fileid', 'f.path')
->selectAlias('st.id', 'storage_string_id')
->from('share', 's')
->leftJoin('s', 'filecache', 'f', $qb->expr()->eq('s.file_source', 'f.fileid'))
->leftJoin('f', 'storages', 'st', $qb->expr()->eq('f.storage', 'st.numeric_id'))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$qb->select('s.*', 'f.fileid', 'f.path')
->selectAlias('st.id', 'storage_string_id')
->from('share', 's')
->leftJoin('s', 'filecache', 'f', $qb->expr()->eq('s.file_source', 'f.fileid'))
->leftJoin('f', 'storages', 'st', $qb->expr()->eq('f.storage', 'st.numeric_id'))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76