Showing 391 of 391 total issues
Method tryCreateSaml2Client
has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tryCreateSaml2Client(final Collection<Client> clients) {
for (var i = 0; i <= MAX_NUM_CLIENTS; i++) {
val keystorePassword = getProperty(SAML_KEYSTORE_PASSWORD, i);
val privateKeyPassword = getProperty(SAML_PRIVATE_KEY_PASSWORD, i);
val keystorePath = getProperty(SAML_KEYSTORE_PATH, i);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method perform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public Object perform(final Config config, final String defaultUrl, final String inputLogoutUrlPattern, final Boolean inputLocalLogout,
final Boolean inputDestroySession, final Boolean inputCentralLogout, final FrameworkParameters parameters) {
LOGGER.debug("=== LOGOUT ===");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tryCreateOidcClient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tryCreateOidcClient(final Collection<Client> clients) {
for (var i = 0; i <= MAX_NUM_CLIENTS; i++) {
val id = getProperty(OIDC_ID, i);
if (isNotBlank(id)) {
val configuration = new OidcConfiguration();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tryCreatePasswordEncoder
has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tryCreatePasswordEncoder(final Map<String, org.pac4j.core.credentials.password.PasswordEncoder> encoders) {
for (var i = 0; i <= MAX_NUM_ENCODERS; i++) {
val type = getProperty(SPRING_ENCODER_TYPE, i);
if (isNotBlank(type)) {
final PasswordEncoder encoder;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package org.pac4j.jee.config;
import jakarta.servlet.*;
import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 328.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package org.pac4j.jee.config;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.val;
import org.pac4j.core.config.Config;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 328.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package org.pac4j.jwt.config.signature;
import com.nimbusds.jose.JOSEException;
import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSAlgorithm;
import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSHeader;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 319.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package org.pac4j.jwt.config.signature;
import com.nimbusds.jose.JOSEException;
import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSAlgorithm;
import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSHeader;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 319.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public Optional<UserProfile> create(final CallContext ctx, final Credentials credentials) {
init();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
FacebookProfile
has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public class FacebookProfile extends OAuth20Profile {
@Serial
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6339376303764855109L;
BasicUserProfile
has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@EqualsAndHashCode
@ToString
public class BasicUserProfile implements UserProfile, Externalizable {
@Serial
TwitterProfile
has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class TwitterProfile extends OAuth10Profile {
@Serial
private static final long serialVersionUID = -6473348745856820192L;
VkProfile
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class VkProfile extends OAuth20Profile {
@Serial
private static final long serialVersionUID = -7889265305949082980L;
File LinkedIn2ProfilePicture.java
has 343 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package org.pac4j.oauth.profile.linkedin2;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.TokenBuffer;
Method buildLdapProperties
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private LdapAuthenticationProperties buildLdapProperties(final int i) {
val ldapProp = new LdapAuthenticationProperties();
val type = getProperty(LDAP_TYPE, i);
ldapProp.setType(LdapAuthenticationProperties.AuthenticationTypes.valueOf(type.toUpperCase()));
ldapProp.setDnFormat(getProperty(LDAP_DN_FORMAT, i));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method buildDataSource
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private DataSource buildDataSource(final int i) throws SQLException {
val ds = new HikariDataSource();
if (containsProperty(DB_DATASOURCE_CLASS_NAME, i)) {
ds.setDataSourceClassName(getProperty(DB_DATASOURCE_CLASS_NAME, i));
} else if (containsProperty(DB_JDBC_URL, i)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method buildProfile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected void buildProfile(final SAML2AuthenticationCredentials credentials) {
UserProfile profile = (SAML2Profile) getProfileDefinition().newProfile();
val nameId = credentials.getNameId();
profile.setId(nameId.getValue());
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File Pac4jHTTPArtifactDecoder.java
has 334 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package org.pac4j.saml.transport;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.Setter;
Method matches
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean matches(final CallContext ctx) {
val webContext = ctx.webContext();
CommonHelper.assertNotNull("csrfTokenGenerator", csrfTokenGenerator);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generateAuth
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void generateAuth(final UserProfile profile, final Iterable<String> attributes) {
if (attributes == null) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"