Showing 959 of 983 total issues
Function liveProvider
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const liveProvider = (client: Client): LiveProvider => {
return {
subscribe: ({ callback, params }) => {
const {
resource,
Function liveProvider
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const liveProvider = (client: Client): LiveProvider => {
return {
subscribe: ({ callback, params }) => {
const {
resource,
Function useNotificationProvider
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const useNotificationProvider = (): NotificationProvider => {
const toast = useToast({
position: "top-right",
isClosable: true,
});
Function RegisterPage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const RegisterPage: React.FC<RegisterProps> = ({
providers,
loginLink,
wrapperProps,
contentProps,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function LoginPage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const LoginPage: React.FC<LoginProps> = ({
providers,
registerLink,
forgotPasswordLink,
rememberMe,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getOperationFields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const getOperationFields = (documentNode: DocumentNode) => {
const fieldLines: string[] = [];
let isInitialEnter = true;
let depth = 0;
let isNestedField = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dataProvider
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const dataProvider = (
apiUrl: string,
httpClient: AxiosInstance = axiosInstance,
): Required<DataProvider> => ({
getList: async ({ resource, pagination, filters, sorters, meta }) => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function imageFields
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const imageFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field.type === "image") {
imports.push(["Image", "@mantine/core"]);
const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
Function basicFields
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const basicFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field && (field.type === "text" || field.type === "number")) {
const fieldProperty = `field: "${field.key}"`;
const headerProperty = `headerName: ${translatePrettyString({
Function booleanFields
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const booleanFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field.type === "boolean") {
if (field.multiple) {
const val = dotAccessor(field.key, undefined, field.accessor);
Function imageFields
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const imageFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field.type === "image") {
imports.push(["Image", "@chakra-ui/react"]);
const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
Function basicInputFields
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const basicInputFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (
field.type === "text" ||
field.type === "url" ||
field.type === "email" ||
Function createdFiles
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
selectedComponent.files.map(async (file) => {
try {
const srcPath = file.src
? path.join(selectedPackage.path, file.src)
: undefined;
Function queryKeysReplacement
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const queryKeysReplacement = (preferLegacyKeys?: boolean) => {
return (
resource?: string,
dataProviderName?: string,
meta?: MetaQuery,
Function emailFields
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const emailFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field.type === "email") {
imports.push(["EmailField", "@refinedev/mui"]);
const fieldProperty = `field: "${field.key}"`;
Function urlFields
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const urlFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field.type === "url") {
imports.push(["UrlField", "@refinedev/mui"]);
const fieldProperty = `field: "${field.key}"`;
Function imageFields
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const imageFields = (field: InferField) => {
if (field.type === "image") {
const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
const accessorKey = getAccessorKey(field);
const header = `header: ${translatePrettyString({
Function printUpdateWarningTable
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const printUpdateWarningTable = async (
params: UpdateWarningTableParams,
) => {
const data = params?.data;
const tableHead = Object.keys(data?.[0] || {});
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const useSiderVisible = (): UseSiderVisibleType => {
const {
mobileSiderOpen,
siderCollapsed,
setMobileSiderOpen,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 79.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const useSiderVisible = (): UseSiderVisibleType => {
const {
mobileSiderOpen,
siderCollapsed,
setMobileSiderOpen,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 79.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76