pankod/refine

View on GitHub
packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Function renderer has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export const renderer = ({
  resource,
  fields,
  meta,
  isCustomPage,
Severity: Minor
Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function basicInputFields has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  const basicInputFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (
      field.type === "text" ||
      field.type === "url" ||
      field.type === "email" ||
Severity: Major
Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx - About 3 hrs to fix

    Function booleanFields has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      const booleanFields = (field: InferField) => {
        if (field.type === "boolean") {
          imports.push(["Checkbox", "@chakra-ui/react"]);
    
          if (field.multiple) {
    Severity: Major
    Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx - About 2 hrs to fix

      Function renderRelationFields has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        const renderRelationFields = (field: InferField) => {
          if (field.relation && field.resource) {
            imports.push(["useSelect", "@refinedev/core"]);
            imports.push(["Select", "@chakra-ui/react"]);
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

        Function relationHooksCode has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            .map((field) => {
              if (field?.relation && !field.fieldable && field.resource) {
                imports.push(["useSelect", "@refinedev/core"]);
                let val = accessor(recordName, field.key, field.accessor, false);
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

          Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
          Open

              if (
                field.type === "text" ||
                field.type === "url" ||
                field.type === "email" ||
                field.type === "number" ||
          Severity: Major
          Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

            Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              const renderedFields: Array<string | undefined> = fields.map((field) => {
                switch (field?.type) {
                  case "text":
                  case "number":
                  case "email":
            Severity: Major
            Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/create.tsx on lines 271..288
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mui/create.tsx on lines 324..341
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mui/edit.tsx on lines 413..430

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 107.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if (
                  field.type === "text" ||
                  field.type === "url" ||
                  field.type === "email" ||
                  field.type === "number" ||
            Severity: Major
            Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/edit.tsx and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/create.tsx on lines 149..209
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/headless/create.tsx on lines 140..207
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/headless/edit.tsx on lines 159..258
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mui/create.tsx on lines 207..264
            packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mui/edit.tsx on lines 218..320

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 70.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status