Sign upLogin

pankod/refine

View on GitHub
Star
packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage

Function renderer has a Cognitive Complexity of 140 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export const renderer = ({
  resource,
  fields,
  meta,
  isCustomPage,
Severity: Minor
Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 2 days to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function renderRelationFields has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  const renderRelationFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field.relation && field.resource) {
      const variableName = `${getVariableName(field.key, "Data")}?.data`;

      if (Array.isArray(field.accessor)) {
Severity: Major
Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 4 hrs to fix

    Function imageFields has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      const imageFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field.type === "image") {
      imports.push(["Image", "@mantine/core"]);

      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
    Severity: Major
    Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 2 hrs to fix

      Function basicFields has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        const basicFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field && (field.type === "text" || field.type === "number")) {
      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
      const accessorKey = getAccessorKey(field);
      const header = `header: ${translatePrettyString({
      Severity: Minor
      Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

        Function emailFields has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          const emailFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field.type === "email") {
      imports.push(["EmailField", "@refinedev/mantine"]);

      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
        Severity: Minor
        Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

          Function urlFields has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            const urlFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field.type === "url") {
      imports.push(["UrlField", "@refinedev/mantine"]);

      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
          Severity: Minor
          Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

            Function booleanFields has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              const booleanFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field?.type === "boolean") {
      imports.push(["BooleanField", "@refinedev/mantine"]);

      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
            Severity: Minor
            Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

              Function dateFields has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                const dateFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field.type === "date") {
      imports.push(["DateField", "@refinedev/mantine"]);

      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
              Severity: Minor
              Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

                Function richtextFields has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  const richtextFields = (field: InferField) => {
    if (field?.type === "richtext") {
      imports.push(["MarkdownField", "@refinedev/mantine"]);

      const id = `id: "${field.key}"`;
                Severity: Minor
                Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

                  Function relationHooksCode has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      .map((field) => {
      if (field?.relation && !field.fieldable && field.resource) {
        imports.push(["GetManyResponse", "@refinedev/core"]);
        imports.push(["useMany", "@refinedev/core"]);
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx - About 1 hr to fix

                    Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                      const renderedFields: Array<string | undefined> = fields.map((field) => {
    switch (field?.type) {
      case "text":
      case "number":
        return basicFields(field);
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx and 3 other locations - About 5 hrs to fix
                    packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/antd/list.tsx on lines 559..581
                    packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/list.tsx on lines 761..783
                    packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mui/list.tsx on lines 774..796

                    Duplicated Code

                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                    Tuning

                    This issue has a mass of 139.

                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                    Refactorings

                    Further Reading

                    Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                      const relationVariableNames = relationFields
    ?.map((field) => {
      if (field?.resource) {
        return getVariableName(field.key, "Data");
      }
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/mantine/list.tsx and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
                    packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/chakra-ui/list.tsx on lines 158..165
                    packages/inferencer/src/inferencers/headless/list.tsx on lines 119..126

                    Duplicated Code

                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                    Tuning

                    This issue has a mass of 55.

                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                    Refactorings

                    Further Reading

                    There are no issues that match your filters.

                    Category
                    Status