Function data
has 293 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var data = (function() {
var API_BASE_URL = 'https://api.github.com';
var API_USER = '/users/';
var API_PUBLIC_EVENTS = '/events/public';
var API_ORG = '/orgs/';
Function data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var data = (function() {
var API_BASE_URL = 'https://api.github.com';
var API_USER = '/users/';
var API_PUBLIC_EVENTS = '/events/public';
var API_ORG = '/orgs/';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File data.js
has 297 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var async = require('./vendor/async.min');
// Data manipulation logic
var data = (function() {
var API_BASE_URL = 'https://api.github.com';
Function getPubEvent
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.getPubEvent = function(user, cb) {
var url = API_BASE_URL + API_USER + user.username + API_PUBLIC_EVENTS;
var userDetailUrl = API_BASE_URL + API_USER + user.username;
async.parallel([
Function _handleCommitDetail
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _handleCommitDetail = function(user, cb, err, res, repo) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var _getRepoCommits = function(username, repo, cb) {
var url = API_REPO + '/' + username + '/' + repo + API_REPO_COMMITS;
d3.json(_useBackend(url))
.get(function(err, data) {
if (err) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 95.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module.getContribution = function(username, repo, cb) {
var url = API_REPO + '/' + username + '/' + repo + API_REPO_CONTRIBUTOR;
d3.json(_useBackend(url))
.get(function(err, data) {
if (err) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 95.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Unexpected literal in error position of callback. Open
cb('User does not exist or have empty commits', null, null);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
For more information visit Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Unexpected literal in error position of callback. Open
cb('There is no GitHub public email for ' + user.username + ', please enter mannually', null, null);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
For more information visit Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Unexpected literal in error position of callback. Open
cb('GitHub API error', null, null);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
For more information visit Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/