Showing 234 of 234 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
vfid << f.id
aw = actividad.respuestafor.where(formulario_id: f.id)
if aw.count == 0
rf = Mr519Gen::Respuestafor.create(
formulario_id: f.id,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method actividadpf_ids=
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def actividadpf_ids=(v)
unless actividad
puts "OJO SIN ACTIVIDAD_ID"
return
end
Method poblacion_cor1440_gen
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def poblacion_cor1440_gen
# En cuenta de poblacion no tiene en cuenta locales,
# para coincidir con tipo de indicador que cuenta
# usando tabla de población
actividad_rangoedadac.inject(0) do |memo, r|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method nueva_asistencia
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def nueva_asistencia
authorize!(:new, Msip::Persona)
if params[:actividad_id].nil?
resp_error("Falta parámetro actividad_id")
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method atributos_show
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def atributos_show
[
:id,
:nombre,
:titulo,
Method recalcula_poblacion
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recalcula_poblacion(actividad)
rangoedad = {}
Cor1440Gen::ActividadRangoedadac
.where(actividad_id: actividad.id).delete_all
actividad.asistencia.each do |asis|
Method filtra_contenido_params
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filtra_contenido_params
if !params || !params[:actividad]
return
end
Method new
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
if params[:mindicadorpf_id] && Cor1440Gen::Mindicadorpf.where(id: params[:mindicadorpf_id].to_i).count == 1
mind = Cor1440Gen::Mindicadorpf.find(params[:mindicadorpf_id].to_i)
fini = Date.today
ffin = fini + 1.month
Method asegura_camposdinamicos
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.asegura_camposdinamicos(persona, current_usuario_id)
if persona.respond_to?(:proyectofinanciero)
persona.proyectofinanciero.each do |pf|
pf.caracterizacion.each do |ca|
cp = Cor1440Gen::Caracterizacionpersona.where(
Method presenta
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def presenta(atr)
case atr.to_s
when 'actividadpf'
m = actividadpf_ids.map do |idapf|
apf = Cor1440Gen::Actividadpf.find(idapf)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method duracion
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def duracion
prob = ""
if params[:fechainicio] &&
params[:fechacierre]
fini = params[:fechainicio]
Method new
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
if params[:proyectofinanciero_id]
@indicadorpf = Indicadorpf.new
@indicadorpf.proyectofinanciero_id = params[:proyectofinanciero_id]
@indicadorpf.numero = "R"
Method actividadpf_ids=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def actividadpf_ids=(v)
unless actividad
puts "OJO SIN ACTIVIDAD_ID"
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method recalcula_poblacion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recalcula_poblacion(actividad)
rangoedad = {}
Cor1440Gen::ActividadRangoedadac
.where(actividad_id: actividad.id).delete_all
actividad.asistencia.each do |asis|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechaini"] ||
params[:filtro]["fechaini"] != ""
@contarb_fechaini = if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechaini"]
Msip::FormatoFechaHelper.inicio_semestre_ant
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechafin"] ||
params[:filtro]["fechafin"] != ""
@contarb_fechafin = if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechafin"]
Msip::FormatoFechaHelper.fin_semestre_ant
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechaini"] ||
params[:filtro]["fechaini"] != ""
@fechaini = if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechaini"]
Msip::FormatoFechaHelper.inicio_semestre_ant
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechafin"] ||
params[:filtro]["fechafin"] != ""
@fechafin = if !params[:filtro] || !params[:filtro]["fechafin"]
Msip::FormatoFechaHelper.fin_semestre_ant
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method gen_descfiltro
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gen_descfiltro
descfiltro = ""
if filtrofechaini && !filtrofechafin
descfiltro += "Después de " + filtrofechaini.to_s + ". "
end
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
elsif a && a[:id] && a[:id] == "" &&
a[:persona_attributes] &&
a[:persona_attributes][:id] &&
a[:persona_attributes][:id].to_i > 0 &&
Msip::Persona.where(