Showing 82 of 82 total issues
Method presenta_contenido
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def presenta_contenido(rr, modhistorial = true)
@leeme = nil
@dir = []
cotejador = TwitterCldr::Collation::Collator.new(
Rails.configuration.i18n.default_locale,
Method campos_vista_formulario
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def campos_vista_formulario(v, formularios, agrega_ult_ed)
ab = ::Ability.new
col = if v.nil? || ab.campos_plantillas[v].nil?
[["", ""]]
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method programa_generacion_listado_int
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def programa_generacion_listado_int(params, extension, campoid, pl, narch)
ids = @registros.map(&campoid)
parsimp = {}
parsimp[:busfechainicio_ini] = nil
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def pintacampos
@plantillahcm = Heb412Gen::Plantillahcm.new
if params[:vista]
vista = Msip::Ubicacion.connection.quote_string(
params[:vista],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def pintacampos
@plantillahcr = Heb412Gen::Plantillahcr.new
if params[:vista]
vista = Msip::Ubicacion.connection.quote_string(
params[:vista],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function completarEnlacePlantilla
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static completarEnlacePlantilla(
elema, idselplantilla, idruta, rutagenera, formatosalida = 'ods'
) {
let formato = formatosalida
let p = $(idselplantilla).val().split('.')
Method llena_plantilla_fd
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.llena_plantilla_fd(plantillahcr, fd)
ruta = File.join(
Rails.application.config.x.heb412_ruta,
plantillahcr.ruta,
).to_s
Method fichaimp
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fichaimp
establece_registro
unless @registro
return
end
Method llena_plantilla_multiple_fd
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.llena_plantilla_multiple_fd(plantillahcm, fd,
nomcontrolador = nil)
ruta = File.join(
Rails.application.config.x.heb412_ruta,
plantillahcm.ruta,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if File.exist?("#{nfuente}.xlsx")
File.delete("#{nfuente}.xlsx")
end
dir = File.dirname(ndest)
bn = File.basename(ndest)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if File.exist?("#{nfuente}.pdf")
File.delete("#{nfuente}.pdf")
end
dir = File.dirname(ndest)
bn = File.basename(ndest)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method update
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
authorize!(:edit, Heb412Gen::Plantillahcr)
@vista = @plantillahcr.vista
respond_to do |format|
if @plantillahcr.update(plantillahcr_params)
Method perform
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform(idplantilla, cmodelo, ccontrolador, ids, narch, parsimp,
extension, campoid = :id, params = nil)
Method vista_listado
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.vista_listado(plant, ids, modelo, narch, parsimp, extension,
campoid = :id, params = nil, controlador = nil)
Method programa_generacion_listado
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def programa_generacion_listado(params, extension, campoid = :id)
if params[:idplantilla].nil? or params[:idplantilla].to_i <= 0 or
@registros == []
flash[:error] = "No hay registros por generar"
elsif Heb412Gen::Plantillahcm.where(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convierte_a_extension_esperada
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.convierte_a_extension_esperada(nfuente, ndest, extension)
if extension == ".ods"
FileUtils.mv(nfuente, "#{ndest}#{extension}")
elsif extension == ".pdf"
if File.exist?("#{nfuente}.pdf")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fichapdf
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fichapdf
establece_registro
unless @registro
return
end
Method pintacampos
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pintacampos
@plantillahcm = Heb412Gen::Plantillahcm.new
if params[:vista]
vista = Msip::Ubicacion.connection.quote_string(
params[:vista],
Method pintacampos
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pintacampos
@plantillahcr = Heb412Gen::Plantillahcr.new
if params[:vista]
vista = Msip::Ubicacion.connection.quote_string(
params[:vista],
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
document.addEventListener("click", (e) => {
if (e.button == 0) {
document.querySelector(".heb412_menucontextual").style.display = "none"
}
})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76