pasosdeJesus/msip

View on GitHub

Showing 272 of 272 total issues

Method fechanac has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def fechanac
            r = ""
            r += anionac.to_s if anionac
            r += "-"
            r += FormatoFechaHelper::ABMESES[mesnac] if mesnac &&
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/models/persona.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method buscar_rango_edad has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def buscar_rango_edad(edad, modelorango)
      if !modelorango || !defined?(modelorango.constantize) ||
          !defined?(!modelorango.constantize.habilitados)
        Rails.logger.debug("No se pudo usar modelorango")
        return -1
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/msip/edad_sexo_helper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method barra_navegacion_prosidebar has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def barra_navegacion_prosidebar(opciones, &bloque)
      fondo = "".html_safe
      if opciones[:imagen_barra_lateral]
        fondo = content_tag(
          :div, class: "image-wrapper"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/msip/bootstrap_helper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method abre_anexo has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def abre_anexo
            if !params[:id].nil?
              @anexo = Anexo.find(params[:id].to_i)
              ruta = @anexo.adjunto_file_name
              if !ruta.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/controllers/anexos_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method genera_asociabasica has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def genera_asociabasica
      if ENV["DISABLE_SPRING"].to_i != 1
        # http://makandracards.com/makandra/24525-disabling-spring-when-debugging
        Rails.logger.debug("Ejecutar con DISABLE_SPRING=1")
        return
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/generators/msip/asociabasica_generator.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mundep has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def mundep
            if !params[:term]
              respond_to do |format|
                format.html { render(inline: "Falta variable term") }
                format.json { render(inline: "Falta variable term") }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/controllers/municipios_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method index has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def index
            if !params[:term]
              respond_to do |format|
                format.html { render(inline: "Falta variable term") }
                format.json { render(inline: "Falta variable term") }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/controllers/gruposper_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fecha_ddMyyyy has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def fecha_ddMyyyy(*fields)
        fields.each do |f|
          define_method("#{f}_ddMyyyy") do
            val = read_attribute(f)
            unless val
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ext/ActiveRecord/base.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mejora_nuevo_numerodocumento_sindoc has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def mejora_nuevo_numerodocumento_sindoc(
            numdoc, persona_id
          )
            numerodocumento = numdoc.to_s + rand(100).to_s
            #% 2147483647 # Max. INTEGER de PostgreSQL
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/controllers/personas_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def renombrar_función_pg(nomini, nomfin)
      reversible do |dir|
        dir.up   do
          ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
            "ALTER FUNCTION #{nomini} RENAME TO #{nomfin};",
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb and 4 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 324..333
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 361..370
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 380..389
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 399..408

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def renombrar_índice_pg(nomini, nomfin)
      reversible do |dir|
        dir.up   do
          ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
            "ALTER INDEX #{nomini} RENAME TO #{nomfin};",
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb and 4 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 305..314
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 361..370
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 380..389
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 399..408

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def renombrar_vistamat_pg(nomini, nomfin)
      reversible do |dir|
        dir.up   do
          ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
            "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW #{nomini} RENAME TO #{nomfin};",
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb and 4 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 305..314
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 324..333
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 361..370
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 380..389

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def renombrar_secuencia_pg(nomini, nomfin)
      reversible do |dir|
        dir.up   do
          ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
            "ALTER SEQUENCE #{nomini} RENAME TO #{nomfin};",
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb and 4 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 305..314
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 324..333
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 380..389
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 399..408

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def renombrar_vista_pg(nomini, nomfin)
      reversible do |dir|
        dir.up   do
          ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
            "ALTER VIEW #{nomini} RENAME TO #{nomfin};",
Severity: Major
Found in app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb and 4 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 305..314
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 324..333
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 361..370
app/helpers/msip/sql_helper.rb on lines 399..408

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if fk.include?(atr.to_s)
          r = aso.select do |a|
            (a.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Reflection::HasManyReflection) ||
             a.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Reflection::BelongsToReflection)) &&
              a.foreign_key.to_s == atr.to_s
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/msip/modelo.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
app/models/msip/modelo.rb on lines 64..70

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if datosent[:fechanac_localizada]
              r = datosent[:fechanac_localizada]
              # suponemos dd/M/yyy
              d = Msip::ImportaHelper.fecha_local_colombia_a_date(r, menserror)
              if d
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/models/persona.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/msip/concerns/models/persona.rb on lines 370..379

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            respond_to do |format|
              format.js { render(text: @ubicacion.id.to_s) }
              format.json { render(json: @ubicacion.id.to_s, status: :created) }
              format.html { render(inline: @ubicacion.id.to_s) }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/controllers/ubicaciones_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/msip/concerns/controllers/ubicaciones_controller.rb on lines 51..54

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if ln.include?(atr.to_s)
          r = aso.select do |a|
            (a.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Reflection::HasManyReflection) ||
             a.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Reflection::BelongsToReflection)) &&
              a.name.to_s == atr.to_s
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/msip/modelo.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
app/models/msip/modelo.rb on lines 53..59

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if datosent[:fechanac]
              r = datosent[:fechanac]
              # suponemos yyyy-mm-dd
              d = Msip::FormatoFechaHelper.reconoce_adivinando_locale(r, menserror)
              if d
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/models/persona.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/msip/concerns/models/persona.rb on lines 382..391

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            respond_to do |format|
              format.js { render(text: @ubicacion.id.to_s) }
              format.json { render(json: @ubicacion.id.to_s, status: :updated) }
              format.html { render(inline: @ubicacion.id.to_s) }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/msip/concerns/controllers/ubicaciones_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/msip/concerns/controllers/ubicaciones_controller.rb on lines 39..42

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language