Showing 380 of 380 total issues
Method personas_procesa_filtros_sivel2_gen
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def personas_procesa_filtros_sivel2_gen(que1, tablas1, where1, que3,
tablas3, where3)
Method personas_consulta_final
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def personas_consulta_final(i, que3, tablas3, where3, qc, gb)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if usuario.observadorffechafin
ffin = usuario.observadorffechafin
end
Method embeber_mapacalordepcol_svg
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def embeber_mapacalordepcol_svg(titulo, subtitulo, titulorangos, fuente,
cantidadesdep, opciones = {})
Method personas_procesa_filtros
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def personas_procesa_filtros(que1, tablas1, where1, que3,
tablas3, where3)
Method personas_segun_tipico
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def personas_segun_tipico(tabla, nomtabla, que1, que3, tablas3, where3)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if usuario.filtrodepartamento_ids.count > 0
dicc_filtro[:ubicacion]={
departamento_id: usuario.filtrodepartamento_ids
}
end
Method edad_de_fechanac_fecha
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def edad_de_fechanac_fecha(anionac, mesnac, dianac,
anio, mes, dia)
Method desagregarpor_tipico
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def desagregarpor_tipico(tabla, nomtabla, que1, que3, tablas3, where3)
Method procesa_filtros_fechas
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def procesa_filtros_fechas(where1)
if (params[:filtro] && params[:filtro]['fechaini'] &&
params[:filtro]['fechaini'] != "")
@pFechaini = fecha_local_estandar(params[:filtro]['fechaini'])
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method procesa_filtros
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def procesa_filtros(que1, tablas1, where1, que3,
tablas3, where3)
Method validacion_estandar
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validacion_estandar(casos, titulo, where,
atr = [:id, :fecha, :nusuario],
encabezado = [
'Código', 'Fecha del Hecho', 'Usuario'],
ordenapor = 'fecha')
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if pt.count > 0
params[:caso][:victima_attributes][victima_indice][:persona_attributes][:persona_trelacion1_attributes][persona_indice][:id] = pt[0].id
else
ptn = Msip::PersonaTrelacion.create(
persona1: vic.persona.id , persona2: p2_id
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if victima_params[:persona_attributes][:id] != ""
vics = Sivel2Gen::Victima.where(
persona_id: victima_params[:persona_attributes][:id])
if vics.count > 0
vic = vics[0]
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cierraCapaDiv(){
if (this.constructor.agregaCapaDiv != undefined) {
this.constructor.agregaCapaDiv.remove(this.constructor.mapa);
}
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method lista
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def lista
if params[:tabla]
r = nil
if (params[:tabla] == "departamento" && params[:pais_id].to_i > 0)
r = Msip::Departamento.where(fechadeshabilitacion: nil,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if victima_params[:id] == ""
if victima_creada == false
vic = Sivel2Gen::Victima.create(victima_params)
victima_creada = true
end
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cerrarinfo(){
if (this.constructor.info != undefined) {
this.constructor.info.remove(this.constructor.mapa);
}
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if assets
cont = assets.find_asset('svg/plant_mapa_calor.svg').source.force_encoding("UTF-8")
else
rutas = Gem::Specification.stubs.map(&:full_gem_path)
rs = rutas.select {|x| x.include?('sivel2_gen')}.first
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method ajusta_titulos
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ajusta_titulos(pFini, pFfin, pTviolencia, pEtiqueta1,
pEtiqueta2, pColormax)