File helper.py
has 456 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@gmail.com>
# Copyright © 2017-2018 Dylan Baker
# This file is released under the GNU GPL, version 3 or a later revision.
# For further details see the COPYING file
Function shorten_author_string
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def shorten_author_string(authors_string, maxlength):
"""
Parse a list of authors concatenated as a text string (comma
separated) and smartly adjust them to maxlength.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pretty_datetime
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pretty_datetime(d):
"""
translates :class:`datetime` `d` to a "sup-style" human readable string.
>>> now = datetime.now()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mimewrap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mimewrap(path, filename=None, ctype=None):
"""Take the contents of the given path and wrap them into an email MIME
part according to the content type. The content type is auto detected from
the actual file contents and the file name if it is not given.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function string_sanitize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def string_sanitize(string, tab_width=8):
r"""
strips, and replaces non-printable characters
:param tab_width: number of spaces to replace tabs with. Read from
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse_mailto
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_mailto(mailto_str):
"""
Interpret mailto-string
:param mailto_str: the string to interpret. Must conform to :rfc:2368.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
TODO found Open
# TODO: make this work on blobs, not paths
- Exclude checks
Line break after binary operator Open
if (ctype == 'application/msword' and
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid breaks after binary operators.
The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.
W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n ~2)
Okay: foo(\n -x)
Okay: foo(x\n [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n -y)
Okay: foo(x, # comment\n -y)
The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n -1 +\n -2)
Line break after binary operator Open
if len(au) > 1 and (remaining_length == 3 or (authors and
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid breaks after binary operators.
The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.
W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n ~2)
Okay: foo(\n -x)
Okay: foo(x\n [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n -y)
Okay: foo(x, # comment\n -y)
The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n -1 +\n -2)