Function keypress
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def keypress(self, size, key):
# if we tabcomplete
if key in ['tab', 'shift tab'] and self.completer:
# if not already in completion mode
if self.completions is None:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File globals.py
has 307 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@gmail.com>
# This file is released under the GNU GPL, version 3 or a later revision.
# For further details see the COPYING file
"""
Function __init__
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, completer, on_exit,
Function __init__
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, choices, callback, cancel=None, select=None,
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, choices, callback, cancel=None, select=None,
separator=' ', choices_to_return=None):
self.choices = choices
self.choices_to_return = choices_to_return or {}
self.callback = callback
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elif key in ('meta delete', 'meta backspace', 'ctrl w'):
end_pos = self.edit_pos
start_pos = self.move_to_next_word(forward=False)
if start_pos is not None:
self.edit_text = (self.edit_text[:start_pos] +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elif key == 'meta d':
start_pos = self.edit_pos
end_pos = self.move_to_next_word(forward=True)
if end_pos is not None:
self.edit_text = (self.edit_text[:start_pos] +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for key, value in lines:
if len(key) > max_key_len:
max_key_len = len(key)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Missing whitespace around arithmetic operator Open
self.set_edit_pos(min(self.edit_pos+1, len(self.edit_text)))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Line break after binary operator Open
self.edit_text = (self.edit_text[:start_pos] +
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid breaks after binary operators.
The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.
W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n ~2)
Okay: foo(\n -x)
Okay: foo(x\n [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n -y)
Okay: foo(x, # comment\n -y)
The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n -1 +\n -2)
Missing whitespace around arithmetic operator Open
self.set_edit_pos(max(self.edit_pos-1, 0))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace around arithmetic operator Open
self.edit_text[self.edit_pos+1:])
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Line break after binary operator Open
self.edit_text = (self.edit_text[:start_pos] +
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid breaks after binary operators.
The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.
W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n ~2)
Okay: foo(\n -x)
Okay: foo(x\n [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n -y)
Okay: foo(x, # comment\n -y)
The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n -1 +\n -2)
Line break after binary operator Open
self.edit_text = (self.edit_text[:self.edit_pos] +
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid breaks after binary operators.
The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.
W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n ~2)
Okay: foo(\n -x)
Okay: foo(x\n [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n -y)
Okay: foo(x, # comment\n -y)
The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n -1 +\n -2)