Showing 94 of 116 total issues
File jquery-1.3.2.js
has 3038 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.3.2
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright (c) 2009 John Resig
Function ajax
has 163 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( s ) {
// Extend the settings, but re-extend 's' so that it can be
// checked again later (in the test suite, specifically)
s = jQuery.extend(true, s, jQuery.extend(true, {}, jQuery.ajaxSettings, s));
Function SHA1
has 130 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
document.SHA1 = function(msg) {
function rotate_left(n,s) {
var t4 = ( n<<s ) | (n>>>(32-s));
return t4;
};
Function SHA1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
document.SHA1 = function(msg) {
function rotate_left(n,s) {
var t4 = ( n<<s ) | (n>>>(32-s));
return t4;
};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( typeof elem === "string" ) {
// Fix "XHTML"-style tags in all browsers
elem = elem.replace(/(<(\w+)[^>]*?)\/>/g, function(all, front, tag){
return tag.match(/^(abbr|br|col|img|input|link|meta|param|hr|area|embed)$/i) ?
all :
Class Panel
has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Panel
include ERB::Util
include Rack::Insight::Logging
include Rack::Insight::Render
include Rack::Insight::Database::RequestDataClient
Function Sizzle
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Sizzle = function(selector, context, results, seed) {
results = results || [];
context = context || document;
if ( context.nodeType !== 1 && context.nodeType !== 9 )
Method content_for_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def content_for_request(number)
logger.info("Rack::Insight is using default content_for_request for #{self.class}") if verbose(:med)
if !self.has_table?
logger.info("#{self.class} is being used without a table") if verbose(:med)
content
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_message
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_message(m)
@m = m.clone
params = ActiveSupport::OrderedHash.new
# Mode, Limits
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( document.documentElement["getBoundingClientRect"] )
jQuery.fn.offset = function() {
if ( !this[0] ) return { top: 0, left: 0 };
if ( this[0] === this[0].ownerDocument.body ) return jQuery.offset.bodyOffset( this[0] );
var box = this[0].getBoundingClientRect(), doc = this[0].ownerDocument, body = doc.body, docElem = doc.documentElement,
Method current_panel_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def current_panel_file(sub)
file_name = nil
matched_line = nil
caller.each do |line|
# First make sure we are not matching rack-insight's own panel class, which will be in the caller stack,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clean
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment ) {
context = context || document;
// !context.createElement fails in IE with an error but returns typeof 'object'
if ( typeof context.createElement === "undefined" )
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && event.clientX != null ) {
var doc = document.documentElement, body = document.body;
event.pageX = event.clientX + (doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0) - (doc.clientLeft || 0);
event.pageY = event.clientY + (doc && doc.scrollTop || body && body.scrollTop || 0) - (doc.clientTop || 0);
}
Function filter
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Sizzle.filter = function(expr, set, inplace, not){
var old = expr, result = [], curLoop = set, match, anyFound,
isXMLFilter = set && set[0] && isXML(set[0]);
while ( expr && set.length ) {
Function attr
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value ) {
// don't set attributes on text and comment nodes
if (!elem || elem.nodeType == 3 || elem.nodeType == 8)
return undefined;
Function remove
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function(elem, types, handler) {
// don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem.nodeType == 3 || elem.nodeType == 8 )
return;
Function val
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
val: function( value ) {
if ( value === undefined ) {
var elem = this[0];
if ( elem ) {
Method root_for_backtrace_filtering
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.root_for_backtrace_filtering(sub_path = nil)
if defined?(Rails) && Rails.respond_to?(:root)
sub_path ? Rails.root.join(sub_path) : Rails.root
else
root = if defined?(RAILS_ROOT)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function trigger
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, bubbling ) {
// Event object or event type
var type = event.type || event;
if( !bubbling ){
Function onreadystatechange
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var onreadystatechange = function(isTimeout){
// The request was aborted, clear the interval and decrement jQuery.active
if (xhr.readyState == 0) {
if (ival) {
// clear poll interval