Showing 116 of 116 total issues
File jquery-1.3.2.js has 3038 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.3.2
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright (c) 2009 John ResigFunction ajax has 163 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( s ) {
// Extend the settings, but re-extend 's' so that it can be
// checked again later (in the test suite, specifically)
s = jQuery.extend(true, s, jQuery.extend(true, {}, jQuery.ajaxSettings, s));
Function SHA1 has 130 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
document.SHA1 = function(msg) {
function rotate_left(n,s) {
var t4 = ( n<<s ) | (n>>>(32-s));
return t4;
};Function SHA1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
document.SHA1 = function(msg) {
function rotate_left(n,s) {
var t4 = ( n<<s ) | (n>>>(32-s));
return t4;
};- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( typeof elem === "string" ) {
// Fix "XHTML"-style tags in all browsers
elem = elem.replace(/(<(\w+)[^>]*?)\/>/g, function(all, front, tag){
return tag.match(/^(abbr|br|col|img|input|link|meta|param|hr|area|embed)$/i) ?
all :Class Panel has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Panel
include ERB::Util
include Rack::Insight::Logging
include Rack::Insight::Render
include Rack::Insight::Database::RequestDataClientFunction Sizzle has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Sizzle = function(selector, context, results, seed) {
results = results || [];
context = context || document;
if ( context.nodeType !== 1 && context.nodeType !== 9 )Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for( i=20; i<=39; i++ ) {
temp = (rotate_left(A,5) + (B ^ C ^ D) + E + W[i] + 0x6ED9EBA1) & 0x0ffffffff;
E = D;
D = C;
C = rotate_left(B,30);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for( i=60; i<=79; i++ ) {
temp = (rotate_left(A,5) + (B ^ C ^ D) + E + W[i] + 0xCA62C1D6) & 0x0ffffffff;
E = D;
D = C;
C = rotate_left(B,30);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method content_for_request has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def content_for_request(number)
logger.info("Rack::Insight is using default content_for_request for #{self.class}") if verbose(:med)
if !self.has_table?
logger.info("#{self.class} is being used without a table") if verbose(:med)
content- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_message has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_message(m)
@m = m.clone
params = ActiveSupport::OrderedHash.new
# Mode, LimitsConsider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( document.documentElement["getBoundingClientRect"] )
jQuery.fn.offset = function() {
if ( !this[0] ) return { top: 0, left: 0 };
if ( this[0] === this[0].ownerDocument.body ) return jQuery.offset.bodyOffset( this[0] );
var box = this[0].getBoundingClientRect(), doc = this[0].ownerDocument, body = doc.body, docElem = doc.documentElement,Method current_panel_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def current_panel_file(sub)
file_name = nil
matched_line = nil
caller.each do |line|
# First make sure we are not matching rack-insight's own panel class, which will be in the caller stack,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clean has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment ) {
context = context || document;
// !context.createElement fails in IE with an error but returns typeof 'object'
if ( typeof context.createElement === "undefined" )Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && event.clientX != null ) {
var doc = document.documentElement, body = document.body;
event.pageX = event.clientX + (doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0) - (doc.clientLeft || 0);
event.pageY = event.clientY + (doc && doc.scrollTop || body && body.scrollTop || 0) - (doc.clientTop || 0);
}Function filter has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Sizzle.filter = function(expr, set, inplace, not){
var old = expr, result = [], curLoop = set, match, anyFound,
isXMLFilter = set && set[0] && isXML(set[0]);
while ( expr && set.length ) {Function attr has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value ) {
// don't set attributes on text and comment nodes
if (!elem || elem.nodeType == 3 || elem.nodeType == 8)
return undefined;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preventDefault: function() {
this.isDefaultPrevented = returnTrue;
var e = this.originalEvent;
if( !e )- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
stopPropagation: function() {
this.isPropagationStopped = returnTrue;
var e = this.originalEvent;
if( !e )- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function remove has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function(elem, types, handler) {
// don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem.nodeType == 3 || elem.nodeType == 8 )
return;