Showing 5 of 7 total issues
Method consume_with_timing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def consume_with_timing(type, file, *args)
$require_bench_semaphore = true
short_type = type[0]
ret = nil
# Not sure if this is actually a useful abstraction...
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _require_bench_consume_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _require_bench_consume_file(type, file, *args)
file_path = file.to_s
# byebug if file_path.match?(/no_group_fox/)
# Global $ variable, which is always truthy while inside the hack, is to
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method consume_with_timing
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def consume_with_timing(type, file, *args)
$require_bench_semaphore = true
short_type = type[0]
ret = nil
# Not sure if this is actually a useful abstraction...
Method _require_bench_file
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _require_bench_file(type, measure, skippy, file_path, *args)
Method _require_bench_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _require_bench_file(type, measure, skippy, file_path, *args)
if !measure && skippy
send("#{type}_without_timing", file_path, *args)
elsif RequireBench::INCLUDE_PATTERN.nil? || measure
RequireBench.consume_with_timing(type, file_path, *args)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"