Showing 3 of 3 total issues
Method status_tag_presenter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def self.status_tag_presenter(object:, aspect: nil, options: {})
# Support for STI and namespaced Objects is accomplished by
# first checking for a Presenter definition at the STI class level
# and then checking for a definition at the super class (generic) level.
namespaces = namespaces_from_class(object.class)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method status_tag_signature_for
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def self.status_tag_signature_for(tag, object, prefix = false, options = nil, status_tag_options = {})
Method text
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def text
return "" unless choice
if choice.text.is_a?(Symbol)
receiver = (self.class)::CHOICE_TEXT_MESSAGE_RECEIVER == :object ? object : self
receiver.send(choice.text)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"