Showing 21 of 33 total issues
Function cli
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function cli(argv) {
program.parse(argv);
if (program.stripShebang === undefined) { program.stripShebang = true; }
if (program.lineNumber === undefined) { program.lineNumber = true; }
if (program.fileName === undefined) { program.fileName = true; }
Function callMatcher
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function callMatcher(callnew, callee) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
callee = callee || "?";
var calleeMatcher = this.matcher(callee);
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = jsstana.eslintRule("(var ?name (call require ?param))", function(context, node, m) {
var n = jsstana.match("(string ?paramname)", m.param);
if (!n) {
context.report(m.param, "require argument isn't string");
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function enter
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
enter: function (node /* , parent */) {
var match = pattern(node);
if (match) {
if (!lines) {
lines = contents.toString().split(/\n/);
Function matcherString
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherString(sexpr) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
var that = this;
if (sexpr.indexOf(".") !== -1) {
Function colorizeLine
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function colorizeLine(line, steps) {
steps = _.sortBy(steps, "pos");
var prevPos = 0;
var currVal = 0;
Function compileCallMatcher
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function compileCallMatcher(args) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
var groups = args.map(function (arg) {
if (typeof arg === "string" && arg.substr(0, 2) === "??") {
Function binaryAssignMatcher
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function binaryAssignMatcher(ratorName, validOperators, exprType, operator, lhs, rhs) {
Function compileCallMatcher
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function compileCallMatcher(args) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
var groups = args.map(function (arg) {
if (typeof arg === "string" && arg.substr(0, 2) === "??") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function callMatcher
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function callMatcher(callnew, callee) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
callee = callee || "?";
var calleeMatcher = this.matcher(callee);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function matcherString
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherString(sexpr) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
var that = this;
if (sexpr.indexOf(".") !== -1) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cli
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function cli(argv) {
program.parse(argv);
if (program.stripShebang === undefined) { program.stripShebang = true; }
if (program.lineNumber === undefined) { program.lineNumber = true; }
if (program.fileName === undefined) { program.fileName = true; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function literalValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function literalValue(type, value) {
return {
any: _.identity,
string: _.identity,
number: function (v) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return function (node) {
return node.type === "Identifier" && node.name === sexpr ? {} : undefined;
};
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (m.name === "jsc" && n.paramname === "jsverify") { return; }
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (m.name === "walk" && n.paramname === "walkdir") { return; }
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (m.name == fileName) { return; }
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return literal[sexpr].call(that);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return unknownNodeType.call(that, rator);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return literal.this.call(that);