Sign upLogin

phadej/jsstana

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 33 of 33 total issues

Function compileCallMatcher has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function compileCallMatcher(args) {
  /* jshint validthis:true */

  var groups = args.map(function (arg) {
    if (typeof arg === "string" && arg.substr(0, 2) === "??") {
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/matchers/call.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function callMatcher has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function callMatcher(callnew, callee) {
  /* jshint validthis:true */
  callee = callee || "?";

  var calleeMatcher = this.matcher(callee);
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/matchers/call.js - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function matcherString has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function matcherString(sexpr) {
  /* jshint validthis:true */
  var that = this;

  if (sexpr.indexOf(".") !== -1) {
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/jsstana.js - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function cli has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function cli(argv) {
  program.parse(argv);
  if (program.stripShebang === undefined) { program.stripShebang = true; }
  if (program.lineNumber === undefined) { program.lineNumber = true; }
  if (program.fileName === undefined) { program.fileName = true; }
Severity: Minor
Found in bin/jsgrep.js - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function literalValue has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function literalValue(type, value) {
  return {
    any: _.identity,
    string: _.identity,
    number: function (v) {
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/matchers/literal.js - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

    return function (node) {
      return node.type === "Identifier" && node.name === sexpr ? {} : undefined;
    };
Severity: Major
Found in lib/jsstana.js - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
    Open

      if (m.name === "jsc" && n.paramname === "jsverify") { return; }
    Severity: Major
    Found in eslint-rules/npm-require-name.js - About 30 mins to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

        if (m.name === "walk" && n.paramname === "walkdir") { return; }
      Severity: Major
      Found in eslint-rules/npm-require-name.js - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

            if (m.name == fileName) { return; }
        Severity: Major
        Found in eslint-rules/npm-require-name.js - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

              return literal[sexpr].call(that);
          Severity: Major
          Found in lib/jsstana.js - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this function.
            Open

                return unknownNodeType.call(that, rator);
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/jsstana.js - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this function.
              Open

                  return literal.this.call(that);
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/jsstana.js - About 30 mins to fix

                Function matcher has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                function matcher(sexpr) {
  /* jshint validthis:true */
  /* eslint no-use-before-define: 0 */
  // JsstancaContext is used here, even defined later
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/jsstana.js - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Severity
                Category
                Status
                Source
                Language