File Pdf.php
has 550 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* PhpMyAdmin\Plugins\Export\Helpers\Pdf class
*/
Method getTableDef
has 140 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getTableDef(
string $db,
string $table,
bool $doRelation,
bool $doComments,
Function getTableDef
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getTableDef(
string $db,
string $table,
bool $doRelation,
bool $doComments,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mysqlReport
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function mysqlReport(string $query): void
{
unset(
$this->tablewidths,
$this->colTitles,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mysqlReport
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function mysqlReport(string $query): void
{
unset(
$this->tablewidths,
$this->colTitles,
Method getTriggers
has 87 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getTriggers(string $db, string $table): void
{
$triggers = Triggers::getDetails(DatabaseInterface::getInstance(), $db, $table);
if ($triggers === []) {
return; //prevents printing blank trigger list for any table
Function getTriggers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getTriggers(string $db, string $table): void
{
$triggers = Triggers::getDetails(DatabaseInterface::getInstance(), $db, $table);
if ($triggers === []) {
return; //prevents printing blank trigger list for any table
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function morepagestable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function morepagestable(int|float $lineheight = 8): void
{
// some things to set and 'remember'
$l = $this->lMargin;
$startheight = $h = $this->dataY;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method morepagestable
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function morepagestable(int|float $lineheight = 8): void
{
// some things to set and 'remember'
$l = $this->lMargin;
$startheight = $h = $this->dataY;
Function checkPageBreak
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function checkPageBreak(mixed $h = 0, mixed $y = '', mixed $addpage = true): bool
{
if (TCPDF_STATIC::empty_string($y)) {
$y = $this->y;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Header
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function Header(): void
{
$GLOBALS['maxY'] ??= null;
// We don't want automatic page breaks while generating header
Method checkPageBreak
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function checkPageBreak(mixed $h = 0, mixed $y = '', mixed $addpage = true): bool
{
if (TCPDF_STATIC::empty_string($y)) {
$y = $this->y;
}
Method __construct
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
string $orientation = 'P',
string $unit = 'mm',
string $format = 'A4',
bool $unicode = true,
string $encoding = 'UTF-8',
Method getTableDef
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
string $db,
string $table,
bool $doRelation,
bool $doComments,
bool $doMime,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($data as $col => $txt) {
$this->page = $currpage;
$this->setXY($l, $h);
if ($this->tablewidths[$col] > 0) {
$this->MultiCell(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 211.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($data as $col => $txt) {
$this->page = $currpage;
$this->setXY($l, $h);
if ($this->tablewidths[$col] > 0) {
$this->MultiCell(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 211.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ($i = $startpage; $i <= $maxpage; $i++) {
$this->page = $i;
$l = $this->lMargin;
$t = $i == $startpage ? $startheight : $this->tMargin;
$lh = $i == $maxpage ? $h : $this->h - $this->bMargin;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ($i = $startpage; $i <= $maxpage; $i++) {
$this->page = $i;
$l = $this->lMargin;
$t = $i == $startpage ? $startheight : $this->tMargin;
$lh = $i == $maxpage ? $h : $this->h - $this->bMargin;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ($i = $startpage; $i <= $maxpage; $i++) {
$this->page = $i;
$l = $this->lMargin;
$t = $i == $startpage ? $startheight : $this->tMargin;
$lh = $i == $maxpage ? $h : $this->h - $this->bMargin;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76