Sign upLogin

piotrmurach/tty-table

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 11 of 11 total issues

Class Table has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Table
    include Comparable, Enumerable, Validatable
    extend Forwardable

    # The table header
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/tty/table.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method column has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def column(index)
      index_unknown = index.is_a?(Integer) && (index >= columns_size || index < 0)
      if block_given?
        return self if index_unknown
        rows.map { |row| yield row[index] }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module TTY
  class Table
    class Border
      # A class that represents a unicode border.
      #
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table/border/unicode.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
    lib/tty/table/border/ascii.rb on lines 5..28

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 38.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module TTY
  class Table
    class Border
      # A class that represents an ascii border.
      #
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table/border/ascii.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
    lib/tty/table/border/unicode.rb on lines 5..28

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 38.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method coerce has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def coerce(rows)
      coerced_rows = []
      Array(rows).each do |row|
        if row == Border::SEPARATOR
          separators << coerced_rows.length - (header ? 0 : 1)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method shrink has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def shrink
        column_size = table.columns_size
        ratio       = ((natural_width - renderer.width) / column_size.to_f).ceil

        widths = (0...column_size).reduce([]) do |lengths, col|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table/column_constraint.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method assert_border_class has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def assert_border_class(border_class)
        return unless border_class
        unless border_class <= TTY::Table::Border
          raise TypeError,
                "#{border_class} should inherit from TTY::Table::Border"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table/renderer.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method enforce has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def enforce
        assert_minimum_width
        padding = renderer.padding

        if natural_width <= renderer.width
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table/column_constraint.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method validate_options! has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def validate_options!(options)
        header = options[:header]
        rows   = options[:rows]

        if header && (!header.is_a?(Array) || header.empty?)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/tty/table/validatable.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    table = TTY::Table.new(header: header) do |t|
  t << %w[11 12 13]
  t << %w[21 22 23]
  t << %w[31 32 33]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in examples/padding.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
    examples/resize.rb on lines 9..12

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 28.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    table = TTY::Table.new(header: header) do |t|
  t << %w[11 12 13]
  t << %w[21 22 23]
  t << %w[31 32 33]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in examples/resize.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
    examples/padding.rb on lines 9..12

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 28.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language