Showing 21 of 29 total issues
Class Cell has 71 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Cell
# Amount of dead space (in PDF points) inside the borders but outside the
# content. Padding defaults to 5pt.
#File cell.rb has 439 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'date'
module Prawn
class Document
# @group Experimental APIMethod aggregate_cell_values has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def aggregate_cell_values(row_or_column, meth, aggregate)
values = {}
#calculate values for all cells that do not span accross multiple cells
#this ensures that we don't have a problem if the first line includes- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Table has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Table
module Interface
# @group Experimental API
# Set up and draw a table on this document. A block can be given, which willFile table.rb has 322 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'prawn'
require_relative 'table/column_width_calculator'
require_relative 'table/cell'
require_relative 'table/cells'
require_relative 'table/cell/in_table'Method make_cells has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_cells(data, cell_style = {})
assert_proper_table_data(data)
cells = Cells.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method natural_widths has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def natural_widths
#calculate natural column width for all rows that do not include a span dummy
@cells.each do |cell|
unless has_a_span_dummy?(cell.row)
@widths_by_column[cell.column] =- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_cells has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_cells(data, cell_style = {})
assert_proper_table_data(data)
cells = Cells.new
Method draw_borders has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def draw_borders(pt)
x, y = pt
@pdf.mask(:line_width, :stroke_color) do
@borders.each do |border|Method aggregate_cell_values has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def aggregate_cell_values(row_or_column, meth, aggregate)
values = {}
#calculate values for all cells that do not span accross multiple cells
#this ensures that we don't have a problem if the first line includesMethod fill_values_if_needed has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fill_values_if_needed(values, cell, index, meth)
#have all spanned indices been filled with a value?
#e.g. values[0], values[1] and values[2] don't return nil given a index of 0 and a colspan of 3
number_of_nil_values = 0
cell.colspan.times do |i|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method draw_borders has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def draw_borders(pt)
x, y = pt
@pdf.mask(:line_width, :stroke_color) do
@borders.each do |border|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method natural_widths has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def natural_widths
#calculate natural column width for all rows that do not include a span dummy
@cells.each do |cell|
unless has_a_span_dummy?(cell.row)
@widths_by_column[cell.column] =Method column_widths has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_widths
@column_widths ||= begin
if width - cells.min_width < -Prawn::FLOAT_PRECISION
raise Errors::CannotFit,
"Table's width was set too small to contain its contents " +Method []= has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def []=(row, col, cell) # :nodoc:
cell.extend(Cell::InTable)
cell.row = row
cell.column = col
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_one_header_row has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_one_header_row(page_of_cells, x_offset, y, row, row_of_header=nil)Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(data, document, options={}, &block)
table_opts = options.dup
@pdf = document
@cells = make_cells(data, table_opts.delete(:cell_style) || {})
@header = false- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method [] has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def [](row, col)
return nil if empty?
index_cells unless defined?(@indexed) && @indexed
row_array, col_array = @rows[@first_row + row] || [], @columns[@first_column + col] || []
if row_array.length < col_array.length- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method with_font has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def with_font
@pdf.save_font do
options = {}
options[:style] = @text_options[:style] if @text_options[:style]
options[:style] ||= @pdf.font.options[:style] if @pdf.font.options[:style]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method transform_spec has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transform_spec(spec, first, total)
case spec
when Range
transform_spec(spec.begin, first, total) ..
transform_spec(spec.end, first, total)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"