File asms_2002_scheme1.rb
has 490 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require_relative "../fragmentable"
module Rubabel
class Molecule
module Fragmentable
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_b_d1_water_loss
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rearrangements << def jasms_2002_scheme1_b_d1_water_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |lo, lc, lh|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2aprime_formaldehyde_loss
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2aprime_formaldehyde_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(carbon1, carbon2, oxygen, carbon3)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1aprime
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1aprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |co, c1, c3, lo, n|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1b_to_d1bprime
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1b_to_d1bprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |co, c, n|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1bprime
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1bprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |n, c2, lo|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |n, cc, o, tbvc|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1_aprimeprime_formaldehyde_loss
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rearrangements << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1_aprimeprime_formaldehyde_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(cyclized_oxygen, freed_carbon, carbon_linked_to_nitrogen, carbon_linker, nitrogen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_b_d1_formaldehyde_loss
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rearrangements << def jasms_2002_scheme1_b_d1_formaldehyde_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |tco, leavingc, leftc|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_b_d1
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_b_d1(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |n, tcc, o|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_a_c1
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_a_c1(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
# Create a fragmentation block method
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |tbcc, o, lc|
# Duplication and mapping identity to new atoms
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2bprime
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2bprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(nitrogen, carbon, leaving_oxygen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1_abprimeprime_water_loss
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rearrangements << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1_abprimeprime_water_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(carbon_linker, alcohol_carbon, oxygen, nitrogen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2aprime
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2aprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(nitrogen, branch_carbon, leaving_oxygen, cyclized_oxygen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2bprime_water_loss
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2bprime_water_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(ring_carbon2, alcohol_carbon, oxygen, nitrogen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
Method jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2aprime_formaldehyde_loss
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2aprime_formaldehyde_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(carbon1, carbon2, oxygen, carbon3)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
::Rearrangements << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1_aprimeprime_formaldehyde_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(cyclized_oxygen, freed_carbon, carbon_linked_to_nitrogen, carbon_linker, nitrogen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1bprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |n, c2, lo|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e1b_to_d1bprime(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |co, c, n|
#duplications and mapping
nmol = self.dup
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
::Rule_names << def jasms_2002_scheme1_c_e2bprime_water_loss(only_uniqs: true, fragment_adduct_state: :as_published)
fragment_sets = []
fragment = lambda do |*arr|
#duplications and mapping
(nmol,(ring_carbon2, alcohol_carbon, oxygen, nitrogen)) = self.dup_molecule(arr)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76