project-callisto/callisto-core

View on GitHub

Showing 28 of 28 total issues

File report_delivery.py has 402 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import json
import logging
import os
from collections import OrderedDict
from io import BytesIO
Severity: Minor
Found in callisto_core/reporting/report_delivery.py - About 5 hrs to fix

    File api.py has 361 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    import copy
    import logging
    import os
    import typing
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in callisto_core/notification/api.py - About 4 hrs to fix

      CallistoCoreNotificationApi has 34 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      class CallistoCoreNotificationApi(object):
      
          report_filename = "callisto_record_{0}.pdf.gpg"
          report_title = "Callisto Record"
          logo_path = "../../assets/callisto_logo.png"
      Severity: Minor
      Found in callisto_core/notification/api.py - About 4 hrs to fix

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function twitter_validation_function. (10)
        Open

        def twitter_validation_function(value):
            path = None
            try:
                url_parts = _get_url_parts(value)
                # check if acceptable domain
        Severity: Minor
        Found in callisto_core/reporting/validators.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function facebook_validation_function. (10)
        Open

        def facebook_validation_function(url):
            try:
                url_parts = _get_url_parts(url)
                # check if acceptable domain
                domain = url_parts[1]
        Severity: Minor
        Found in callisto_core/reporting/validators.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        File view_partials.py has 269 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        """
        
        View partials provide all the callisto-core front-end functionality.
        Subclass these partials with your own views if you are implementing
        callisto-core. Many of the view partials only provide a subset of the
        Severity: Minor
        Found in callisto_core/reporting/view_partials.py - About 2 hrs to fix

          StepsHelper has 21 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          class StepsHelper(object):
              done_name = "done"
              review_name = "Review"
              next_name = "Next"
              back_name = "Back"
          Severity: Minor
          Found in callisto_core/wizard_builder/view_helpers.py - About 2 hrs to fix

            Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function make_key. (7)
            Open

            def make_key(encode_prefix, key, salt):
                iterations = None
                hasher = identify_hasher(encode_prefix)
            
                if not encode_prefix:
            Severity: Minor
            Found in callisto_core/delivery/hashers.py by radon

            Cyclomatic Complexity

            Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

            Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

            Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
            if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
            elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
            else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
            for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
            while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
            except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
            finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
            with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
            assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
            Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
            Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

            Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

            Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method dispatch. (6)
            Open

                def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
                    logger.debug(f"{self.__class__.__name__} access check")
            
                    if (
                        self.access_granted or self.access_form_valid

            Cyclomatic Complexity

            Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

            Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

            Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
            if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
            elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
            else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
            for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
            while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
            except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
            finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
            with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
            assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
            Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
            Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

            Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

            Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _decode. (6)
            Open

                def _decode(self, encoded):
                    """
                    Split an encoded hash and return: (
                        algorithm, variety, version, time_cost, memory_cost,
                        parallelism, salt, data,
            Severity: Minor
            Found in callisto_core/delivery/hashers.py by radon

            Cyclomatic Complexity

            Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

            Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

            Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
            if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
            elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
            else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
            for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
            while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
            except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
            finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
            with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
            assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
            Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
            Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

            Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

            Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method clean. (6)
            Open

                def clean(self):
                    identifiers = set()
                    identifier_type = ""
                    identifier_types = validators.perp_identifiers()
                    from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
            Severity: Minor
            Found in callisto_core/reporting/forms.py by radon

            Cyclomatic Complexity

            Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

            Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

            Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
            if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
            elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
            else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
            for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
            while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
            except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
            finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
            with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
            assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
            Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
            Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

            Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

            Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function add_aria_tags_to_field. (6)
            Open

            @register.filter(is_safe=True)
            def add_aria_tags_to_field(field):
                attrs = []
                if field.help_text or field.label:
                    attrs.append("aria-describedby:help-" + field.id_for_label)

            Cyclomatic Complexity

            Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

            Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

            Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
            if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
            elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
            else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
            for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
            while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
            except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
            finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
            with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
            assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
            Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
            Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

            Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

            Function clean has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def clean(self):
                    identifiers = set()
                    identifier_type = ""
                    identifier_types = validators.perp_identifiers()
                    from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
            Severity: Minor
            Found in callisto_core/reporting/forms.py - About 1 hr to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def on_retry(self, exc, task_id, args, kwargs, einfo):
                    """Log the exception(s) on retry."""
                    logger.info("CLERY TASK RETRY: {0!r} FAILED: {1!r}".format(task_id, exc))
                    super(CallistoCoreBaseTask, self).on_retry(exc, task_id, args, kwargs, einfo)
            Severity: Major
            Found in callisto_core/celeryconfig/tasks.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            callisto_core/celeryconfig/tasks.py on lines 23..26

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 48.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def on_failure(self, exc, task_id, args, kwargs, einfo):
                    """Log the exception(s) on failure."""
                    logger.error("CLERY TASK FAILURE: {0!r} FAILED: {1!r}".format(task_id, exc))
                    super(CallistoCoreBaseTask, self).on_failure(exc, task_id, args, kwargs, einfo)
            Severity: Major
            Found in callisto_core/celeryconfig/tasks.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            callisto_core/celeryconfig/tasks.py on lines 18..21

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 48.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Function set_up_styles has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def set_up_styles(self, *args, **kwargs):
                    """
                    Helper formatting methods assume the following styles have been defined:
                        * Normal: format_question, get_metadata_page
                        * Notes: get_metadata_page
            Severity: Minor
            Found in callisto_core/reporting/report_delivery.py - About 1 hr to fix

              Function __init__ has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def __init__(
              Severity: Major
              Found in callisto_core/reporting/report_delivery.py - About 50 mins to fix

                Function facebook_validation_function has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                def facebook_validation_function(url):
                    try:
                        url_parts = _get_url_parts(url)
                        # check if acceptable domain
                        domain = url_parts[1]
                Severity: Minor
                Found in callisto_core/reporting/validators.py - About 45 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function send_report_to_authority has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    def send_report_to_authority(
                Severity: Minor
                Found in callisto_core/notification/api.py - About 45 mins to fix

                  Function slack_notification has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def slack_notification(
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in callisto_core/notification/api.py - About 45 mins to fix
                    Severity
                    Category
                    Status
                    Source
                    Language