Class ErbContext
has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ErbContext < OpenStruct
def initialize(vars)
super(vars)
File hqmf-generator.rb
has 353 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module HQMF2
module Generator
def self.render_template(name, params)
template_path = File.expand_path(File.join('..', "#{name}.xml.erb"), __FILE__)
Method data_criteria_template_name
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def data_criteria_template_name(data_criteria)
case data_criteria.definition
when 'diagnosis', 'diagnosis_family_history'
'condition_criteria'
when 'encounter'
Method reference_type_name
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reference_type_name(id)
referenced_criteria = doc.data_criteria(id)
type = nil
if referenced_criteria
type = referenced_criteria.type
Method data_criteria_template_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def data_criteria_template_name(data_criteria)
case data_criteria.definition
when 'diagnosis', 'diagnosis_family_history'
'condition_criteria'
when 'encounter'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method xml_for_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xml_for_fields(criteria)
fields = []
if criteria.field_values
criteria.field_values.each_pair do |key, value|
if key == "FLFS"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reference_type_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reference_type_name(id)
referenced_criteria = doc.data_criteria(id)
type = nil
if referenced_criteria
type = referenced_criteria.type
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method data_criteria_should_be_grouper?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def data_criteria_should_be_grouper?(criteria)
return false unless criteria
return false unless criteria.definition == 'derived'
return true unless criteria.subset_operators
criteria.subset_operators.all? {|o| o.supports_grouper_criteria?}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method xml_for_local_variable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xml_for_local_variable(criteria)
name = @local_var_names[criteria.id]
unless name
if criteria.specific_occurrence && !criteria.id.starts_with?("Occurrence#{criteria.specific_occurrence}")
name = "Occurrence#{criteria.specific_occurrence}#{criteria.id}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method element_name_prefix
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def element_name_prefix(data_criteria)
type = data_criteria ? data_criteria.type : :observation
case type
when :encounters
'encounter'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def xml_for_temporal_references(criteria)
refs = []
if criteria.temporal_references
refs = criteria.temporal_references.collect do |reference|
HQMF2::Generator.render_template('temporal_relationship', {'doc' => doc, 'relationship' => reference, 'criteria' => criteria})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def xml_for_subsets(data_criteria)
subsets_xml = []
if data_criteria.subset_operators
subsets_xml = data_criteria.subset_operators.collect do |operator|
HQMF2::Generator.render_template('subset', {'doc' => doc, 'subset' => operator, 'criteria' => data_criteria})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76