Method definition_for_nil_entry
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def definition_for_nil_entry
reference = @entry.at_xpath('./*/cda:outboundRelationship/cda:criteriaReference', HQMF2::Document::NAMESPACES)
ref_id = nil
unless reference.nil?
ref_id = "#{HQMF2::Utilities.attr_val(reference, 'cda:id/@extension')}_#{HQMF2::Utilities.attr_val(reference, 'cda:id/@root')}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_entry_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_entry_type(entry_type)
# settings is required to trigger exceptions, which set the definition
HQMF::DataCriteria.get_settings_for_definition(entry_type, @status)
@definition = entry_type
rescue
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method definition_for_nil_entry
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def definition_for_nil_entry
reference = @entry.at_xpath('./*/cda:outboundRelationship/cda:criteriaReference', HQMF2::Document::NAMESPACES)
ref_id = nil
unless reference.nil?
ref_id = "#{HQMF2::Utilities.attr_val(reference, 'cda:id/@extension')}_#{HQMF2::Utilities.attr_val(reference, 'cda:id/@root')}"
Method extract_definition_from_template_id
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_definition_from_template_id
found = false
@template_ids.each do |template_id|
defs = HQMF::DataCriteria.definition_for_template_id(template_id, 'r2')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_information_for_specific_variable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_information_for_specific_variable
reference = @entry.at_xpath('./*/cda:outboundRelationship/cda:criteriaReference',
HQMF2::Document::NAMESPACES)
if reference
ref_id = strip_tokens(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"