Showing 13 of 13 total issues
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(path = '.')
path = File.expand_path(path)
gem_names = options[:runner].any? ? options[:runner] : ::Pronto::GemNames.new.to_a
gem_names.each do |gem_name|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format(messages, _repo, _patches)
messages.map do |message|
lineno = message.line.new_lineno if message.line
result = { level: message.level[0].upcase, message: message.msg }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method paged_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def paged_request(url, query = {})
Enumerator.new do |yielder|
next_page_start = 0
loop do
response = get(url, query.merge(start: next_page_start))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(path, line, level, msg, commit_sha = nil, runner = nil)
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(patches)
patches = reject_excluded(config.excluded_files('all'), patches)
return [] if patches.none?
result = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_commit_comment
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_commit_comment(slug, sha, body, path, position)
Method create_pull_comment
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_pull_comment(slug, pull_id, body, path, position)
Method create_pull_comment
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_pull_comment(slug, pull_id, body, path, position)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def slug
return @config.bitbucket_slug if @config.bitbucket_slug
@slug ||= begin
@repo.remote_urls.map do |url|
hostname = Regexp.escape(@config.bitbucket_hostname)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def slug
return @config.github_slug if @config.github_slug
@slug ||= begin
@repo.remote_urls.map do |url|
hostname = Regexp.escape(@config.github_hostname)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method format_location
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_location(message)
line = message.line
lineno = line.new_lineno if line
path = message.path
commit_sha = message.commit_sha
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_comments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_comments(values)
values.each do |value|
value.content = value.content['raw']
value.line_to = value.inline ? value.inline['to'] : 0
value.filename = value.inline ? value.inline['path'] : ''
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remove_duplicate_comments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_duplicate_comments(old_comments, new_comments)
new_comments.each_with_object([]) do |(key, comments), memo|
existing = old_comments[key]
comments = dedupe_comments(existing, comments) if existing
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"