Field331 has 152 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
@Generated
public class Field331 extends Field implements Serializable, DateContainer {
/**
* Constant identifying the SRU to which this class belongs to.File Field331.java has 860 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* Copyright 2006-2023 Prowide
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.Method getValueDisplay has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public String getValueDisplay(int component, Locale locale) {
if (component < 1 || component > 12) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid component number " + component + " for field 331");
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getValueDisplay has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public String getValueDisplay(int component, Locale locale) {
if (component < 1 || component > 12) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid component number " + component + " for field 331");
}Method fromJson has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Field331 fromJson(final String json) {
final Field331 field = new Field331();
final JsonObject jsonObject = JsonParser.parseString(json).getAsJsonObject();Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void parse(final String value) {
init(12);
if (value != null) {
if (value.length() >= 4) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fromJson has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Field331 fromJson(final String json) {
final Field331 field = new Field331();
final JsonObject jsonObject = JsonParser.parseString(json).getAsJsonObject();- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(12);Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return null;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(10);Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(6);Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(11);Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(9);Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return f.format(cal.getTime());Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(7);Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return getComponent(8);Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 22 to the 15 allowed. Open
public String getValueDisplay(int component, Locale locale) {- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "dateSessionClosed" 3 times. Open
result.put(4, "dateSessionClosed");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "dateSessionOpened" 3 times. Open
result.put(2, "dateSessionOpened");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "lastOutputSequenceNumber" 3 times. Open
result.put(12, "lastOutputSequenceNumber");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "firstInputSequenceNumber" 3 times. Open
result.put(9, "firstInputSequenceNumber");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "timeSessionOpened" 3 times. Open
result.put(3, "timeSessionOpened");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "sessionNumber" 3 times. Open
result.put(1, "sessionNumber");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "lastInputSequenceNumber" 3 times. Open
result.put(10, "lastInputSequenceNumber");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "firstOutputSequenceNumber" 3 times. Open
result.put(11, "firstOutputSequenceNumber");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "quantityOfMessagesReceived" 3 times. Open
result.put(8, "quantityOfMessagesReceived");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "reasonForClosure" 3 times. Open
result.put(6, "reasonForClosure");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "quantityOfMessagesSent" 3 times. Open
result.put(7, "quantityOfMessagesSent");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Use already-defined constant 'COMPONENTS_PATTERN' instead of duplicating its value here. Open
return "NEHEHNNNNNNN";- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Use already-defined constant 'PARSER_PATTERN' instead of duplicating its value here. Open
return "4!N<DATE2><HHMM><DATE2><HHMM>3!N6!N6!N6!N6!N6!N6!N";- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "timeSessionClosed" 3 times. Open
result.put(5, "timeSessionClosed");- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() {
prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
execute("action1");
release("action1");
}
@SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }
public String method3(String a) {
System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant
public void run() {
prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant
execute(ACTION_1);
release(ACTION_1);
}
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.