prowide/prowide-core

View on GitHub
src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
5 days
Test Coverage

Field86 has 55 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

@SuppressWarnings("unused")
@Generated
public class Field86 extends Field implements Serializable, MultiLineField {
    /**
     * Constant identifying the SRU to which this class belongs to.
Severity: Major
Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 7 hrs to fix

    File Field86.java has 363 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    /*
     * Copyright 2006-2023 Prowide
     *
     * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
     * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 4 hrs to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this method.
      Open

                  return getComponent(5);
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
        Open

                return null;
        Severity: Major
        Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                  return false;
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                        return true;
            Severity: Major
            Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                          return getComponent(6);
              Severity: Major
              Found in src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field86.java - About 30 mins to fix

                Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "narrative4" 4 times.
                Open

                        result.put(4, "narrative4");

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Use already-defined constant 'COMPONENTS_PATTERN' instead of duplicating its value here.
                Open

                        return "SSSSSS";

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "narrative6" 4 times.
                Open

                        result.put(6, "narrative6");

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Use already-defined constant 'PARSER_PATTERN' instead of duplicating its value here.
                Open

                        return "S[$S]0-5";

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "narrative2" 4 times.
                Open

                        result.put(2, "narrative2");

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "narrative5" 4 times.
                Open

                        result.put(5, "narrative5");

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "narrative3" 4 times.
                Open

                        result.put(3, "narrative3");

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "narrative" 4 times.
                Open

                        result.put(1, "narrative");

                Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

                On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

                Noncompliant Code Example

                With the default threshold of 3:

                public void run() {
                  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
                  execute("action1");
                  release("action1");
                }
                
                @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
                private void method1() { /* ... */ }
                @SuppressWarning("all")
                private void method2() { /* ... */ }
                
                public String method3(String a) {
                  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
                }
                

                Compliant Solution

                private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
                
                public void run() {
                  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
                  execute(ACTION_1);
                  release(ACTION_1);
                }
                

                Exceptions

                To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

                Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                /*
                 * Copyright 2006-2023 Prowide
                 *
                 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
                 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
                src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field35E.java on lines 1..853
                src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field44D.java on lines 1..853
                src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field71C.java on lines 1..853
                src/generated/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/Field80C.java on lines 1..853

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 1771.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status