Sign upLogin

prowide/prowide-core

View on GitHub
Star
src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File SwiftParseUtilsTest.java has 294 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 * Copyright 2006-2023 Prowide
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
Severity: Minor
Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method testSplitComponents has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @Test
    public void testSplitComponents() {
        assertEquals(0, SwiftParseUtils.splitComponents(null, null, null).size());
        assertEquals(0, SwiftParseUtils.splitComponents(null, null, "/").size());
        assertEquals(0, SwiftParseUtils.splitComponents(null, ":", null).size());
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java - About 1 hr to fix

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":foo//abc" 4 times.
      Open

              assertEquals(2, SwiftParseUtils.splitComponents(":foo//abc", ":", "//").size());
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "ABC234234asd" 4 times.
      Open

              assertEquals("ABC", SwiftParseUtils.getAlphaPrefix("ABC234234asd"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "//foo" 4 times.
      Open

              assertEquals("foo", SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond("//foo", "/", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "foo//abc/jhs" 3 times.
      Open

              assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond("foo//abc/jhs", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "///foo" 3 times.
      Open

              assertEquals("/foo", SwiftParseUtils.getTokenThirdLast("///foo", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "foo//abc/" 3 times.
      Open

              assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond("foo//abc/", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "foo//" 5 times.
      Open

              assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond("foo//", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "ddd/sss/" 4 times.
      Open

              assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenThird("ddd/sss/", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":foo//" 3 times.
      Open

              assertEquals(1, SwiftParseUtils.splitComponents(":foo//", ":", "//").size());
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "ddd//" 4 times.
      Open

              assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenThird("ddd//", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "foo//abc/lksjdf//" 3 times.
      Open

              assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond("foo//abc/lksjdf//", "/"));
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "foo//abc" 6 times.
      Open

              assertEquals(2, SwiftParseUtils.splitComponents("foo//abc", ":", "//").size());
      Severity: Critical
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java by sonar-java

      Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

      On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

      Noncompliant Code Example

      With the default threshold of 3:

      public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

      Compliant Solution

      private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

      Exceptions

      To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Test
    public void testGetTokenSecond() {
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond(null, null));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond("", ""));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenSecond(null, "/"));
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
      src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java on lines 283..302

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 219.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Test
    public void testGetTokenForth() {
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenForth(null, null));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenForth("", ""));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getTokenForth(null, "/"));
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
      src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java on lines 154..173

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 219.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Test
    public void testGetNumericPrefix() {
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getNumericPrefix(null));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getNumericPrefix(""));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getNumericPrefix("asdfD"));
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java on lines 93..105

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 115.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Test
    public void testGetAlphaSuffix() {
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getAlphaSuffix(null));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getAlphaSuffix(""));
        assertNull(SwiftParseUtils.getAlphaSuffix("12342"));
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/SwiftParseUtilsTest.java on lines 107..119

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 115.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status