prowide/prowide-core

View on GitHub
src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/mt/AbstractMTTest.java

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method test_conversin_to_xml has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void test_conversin_to_xml() {
        String fin =
                "{1:F01FMACUS33AXXX1625159979}{2:O5471302141113CHASUSU9AXXX05821058501411131302N}{3:{108:001823CQ1833911}}{4:\n"
                        + ":16R:GENL\n"
Severity: Major
Found in src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/mt/AbstractMTTest.java - About 2 hrs to fix

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":23E:SDVA " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":23E:SDVA\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":20:1234567890 " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":20:1234567890\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":16S:AMT " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":16S:AMT\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":23B:CRED " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":23B:CRED\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":16S:SETPRTY " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":16S:SETPRTY\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":16R:SETPRTY " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":16R:SETPRTY\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ":16R:AMT " 3 times.
    Open

                            + ":16R:AMT\n"

    Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

    On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    With the default threshold of 3:

    public void run() {
      prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
      execute("action1");
      release("action1");
    }
    
    @SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
    private void method1() { /* ... */ }
    @SuppressWarning("all")
    private void method2() { /* ... */ }
    
    public String method3(String a) {
      System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
      return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
    }
    

    Compliant Solution

    private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant
    
    public void run() {
      prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
      execute(ACTION_1);
      release(ACTION_1);
    }
    

    Exceptions

    To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            String fin =
                    "{1:F01FMACUS33AXXX1625159979}{2:O5471302141113CHASUSU9AXXX05821058501411131302N}{3:{108:001823CQ1833911}}{4:\n"
                            + ":16R:GENL\n"
                            + ":20C::SEME//T314314CDM0\n"
                            + ":23G:NEWM\n"
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/XMLParserTest.java on lines 348..395

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 200.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            final String msg =
                    "{1:F21OMFNCIABAXXX6368087500}{4:{177:1511041614}{451:0}}{1:F01OMFNCIABAXXX6368087500}{2:O1031542151104BCAOSNDPAXXX22438129121511041542N}{3:{113:0030}{108:001RTGS153030005}}{4:\n"
                            + ":20:1234567890\n"
                            + ":23B:CRED\n"
                            + ":23E:SDVA\n"
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/issues/Bug3085740.java on lines 31..48
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/SwiftParserConsumeTagTest.java on lines 97..114
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/SwiftParserTest.java on lines 218..237
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/SwiftParserTest.java on lines 329..347
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/mt/AbstractMTTest.java on lines 137..156

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 80.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            final String msg =
                    "{1:F21OMFNCIABAXXX6368087500}{4:{177:1511041614}{451:0}}{1:F01OMFNCIABAXXX6368087500}{2:O1031542151104BCAOSNDPAXXX22438129121511041542N}{3:{113:0030}{108:001RTGS153030005}}{4:\n"
                            + ":20:1234567890\n"
                            + ":23B:CRED\n"
                            + ":23E:SDVA\n"
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/issues/Bug3085740.java on lines 31..48
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/SwiftParserConsumeTagTest.java on lines 97..114
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/SwiftParserTest.java on lines 218..237
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/SwiftParserTest.java on lines 329..347
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/mt/AbstractMTTest.java on lines 243..262

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 80.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            MT940 mt = MT940.parse(
                    "{1:F01ANASCH20AXXX0000000000}{2:I940BSCHGB2LXEQUN}{3:{108:FOOB3926BE868XXX}}{4:\n" + ":20:123456\n"
                            + ":25:123-304958\n"
                            + ":28C:123/1\n"
                            + ":60F:C980622USD395212311,71\n"
    src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/io/parser/MT202ParserTest.java on lines 236..253

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 69.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status