Sign upLogin

pseewald/fprettify

View on GitHub
Star
fprettify/__init__.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 wks
Test Coverage

File __init__.py has 1601 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
###############################################################################
#    This file is part of fprettify.
#    Copyright (C) 2016-2019 Patrick Seewald, CP2K developers group
Severity: Major
Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 4 days to fix

    Function process_lines_of_fline has a Cognitive Complexity of 83 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def process_lines_of_fline(self, f_line, lines, rel_ind, rel_ind_con,
                               line_nr, indent_fypp=True, manual_lines_indent=None):
        """
        Process all lines that belong to a Fortran line `f_line`.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function run has a Cognitive Complexity of 68 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def run(argv=sys.argv):  # pragma: no cover
    """Command line interface"""

    try:
        import configargparse as argparse
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function reformat_ffile_combined has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def reformat_ffile_combined(infile, outfile, impose_indent=True, indent_size=3, strict_indent=False, impose_whitespace=True,
                            case_dict={},
                            impose_replacements=False, cstyle=False, whitespace=2, whitespace_dict={}, llength=132,
                            strip_comments=False, format_decl=False, orig_filename=None, indent_fypp=True, indent_mod=True):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function add_whitespace_charwise has a Cognitive Complexity of 63 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def add_whitespace_charwise(line, spacey, scope_parser, format_decl, filename, line_nr):
    """add whitespace character wise (no need for context aware parsing)"""
    line_ftd = line
    pos_eq = []
    end_of_delim = -1
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method process_lines_of_fline. (52)
    Open

        def process_lines_of_fline(self, f_line, lines, rel_ind, rel_ind_con,
                               line_nr, indent_fypp=True, manual_lines_indent=None):
        """
        Process all lines that belong to a Fortran line `f_line`.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function __align_line_continuations has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __align_line_continuations(self, line, is_decl, is_use, indent_size, line_nr):
        """align continuation lines."""

        indent_list = self._br_indent_list
        level = self._level
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 7 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function add_whitespace_charwise. (38)
    Open

    def add_whitespace_charwise(line, spacey, scope_parser, format_decl, filename, line_nr):
    """add whitespace character wise (no need for context aware parsing)"""
    line_ftd = line
    pos_eq = []
    end_of_delim = -1
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function reformat_ffile_combined. (36)
    Open

    def reformat_ffile_combined(infile, outfile, impose_indent=True, indent_size=3, strict_indent=False, impose_whitespace=True,
                            case_dict={},
                            impose_replacements=False, cstyle=False, whitespace=2, whitespace_dict={}, llength=132,
                            strip_comments=False, format_decl=False, orig_filename=None, indent_fypp=True, indent_mod=True):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function run. (35)
    Open

    def run(argv=sys.argv):  # pragma: no cover
    """Command line interface"""

    try:
        import configargparse as argparse
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __align_line_continuations. (30)
    Open

        def __align_line_continuations(self, line, is_decl, is_use, indent_size, line_nr):
        """align continuation lines."""

        indent_list = self._br_indent_list
        level = self._level
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function replace_keywords_single_fline has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def replace_keywords_single_fline(f_line, case_dict):
    """
    format a single Fortran line - change case of keywords
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 5 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function replace_keywords_single_fline. (29)
    Open

    def replace_keywords_single_fline(f_line, case_dict):
    """
    format a single Fortran line - change case of keywords
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function add_whitespace_context has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def add_whitespace_context(line, spacey):
    """
    for context aware whitespace formatting we extract line parts that are
    not comments or strings in order to be able to apply a context aware regex.
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function add_whitespace_context. (17)
    Open

    def add_whitespace_context(line, spacey):
    """
    for context aware whitespace formatting we extract line parts that are
    not comments or strings in order to be able to apply a context aware regex.
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function split has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def split(self, line):
        partsplit = self._re.split(line)
        partsplit_out = []

        # exclude splits due to '+/-' in real literals
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function search has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def search(self, line):
        match = self._re.search(line)

        if match:
            level = 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class F90Indenter. (14)
    Open

    class F90Indenter(object):
    """
    Parses encapsulation of subunits / scopes line by line
    and updates the indentation.
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function preprocess_line. (13)
    Open

    def preprocess_line(f_line, lines, comments, filename, line_nr, indent_fypp):
    """preprocess lines: identification and formatting of special cases"""
    is_blank = False
    prev_indent = False
    do_format = False
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function rm_extra_whitespace. (13)
    Open

    def rm_extra_whitespace(line, format_decl):
    """rm all unneeded whitespace chars, except for declarations"""
    line_ftd = ''
    pos_prev = -1
    pos = -1
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function preprocess_line has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def preprocess_line(f_line, lines, comments, filename, line_nr, indent_fypp):
    """preprocess lines: identification and formatting of special cases"""
    is_blank = False
    prev_indent = False
    do_format = False
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function split_reformatted_line. (12)
    Open

    def split_reformatted_line(line_orig, linebreak_pos_orig, ampersand_sep, line, filename, line_nr):
    """
    Infer linebreak positions of formatted line from linebreak positions in
    original line and split line.
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function rm_extra_whitespace has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def rm_extra_whitespace(line, format_decl):
    """rm all unneeded whitespace chars, except for declarations"""
    line_ftd = ''
    pos_prev = -1
    pos = -1
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function format_single_fline. (11)
    Open

    def format_single_fline(f_line, whitespace, whitespace_dict, linebreak_pos,
                        ampersand_sep, scope_parser, format_decl, filename, line_nr,
                        auto_format=True):
    """
    format a single Fortran line - imposes white space formatting
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function inspect_ffile_format. (11)
    Open

    def inspect_ffile_format(infile, indent_size, strict_indent, indent_fypp=False, orig_filename=None):
    """
    Determine indentation by inspecting original Fortran file.

    This is mainly for finding aligned blocks of DO/IF statements.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function parse_fprettify_directives. (11)
    Open

    def parse_fprettify_directives(lines, comment_lines, in_format_off_block, filename, line_nr):
    """
    parse formatter directives '!&' and line continuations starting with an
    ampersand.
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function write_formatted_line has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def write_formatted_line(outfile, indent, lines, orig_lines, indent_special, llength, use_same_line, is_omp_conditional, label, filename, line_nr):
    """Write reformatted line to file"""

    for ind, line, orig_line in zip(indent, lines, orig_lines):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method split. (10)
    Open

        def split(self, line):
        partsplit = self._re.split(line)
        partsplit_out = []

        # exclude splits due to '+/-' in real literals
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function replace_relational_single_fline has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def replace_relational_single_fline(f_line, cstyle):
    """
    format a single Fortran line - replaces scalar relational
    operators in logical expressions to either Fortran or C-style.
    .lt.  <-->  <
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function write_formatted_line. (9)
    Open

    def write_formatted_line(outfile, indent, lines, orig_lines, indent_special, llength, use_same_line, is_omp_conditional, label, filename, line_nr):
    """Write reformatted line to file"""

    for ind, line, orig_line in zip(indent, lines, orig_lines):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method search. (9)
    Open

        def search(self, line):
        match = self._re.search(line)

        if match:
            level = 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class where_parser. (9)
    Open

    class where_parser(parser_re):
    """parser for where / forall construct
    """
    def search(self, line):
        match = self._re.search(line)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function parse_fprettify_directives has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def parse_fprettify_directives(lines, comment_lines, in_format_off_block, filename, line_nr):
    """
    parse formatter directives '!&' and line continuations starting with an
    ampersand.
    """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_linebreak_pos. (8)
    Open

    def get_linebreak_pos(lines, filter_fypp=True):
    """extract linebreak positions in Fortran line from lines"""
    linebreak_pos = []
    if filter_fypp:
        notfortran_re = NOTFORTRAN_LINE_RE
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function replace_relational_single_fline. (8)
    Open

    def replace_relational_single_fline(f_line, cstyle):
    """
    format a single Fortran line - replaces scalar relational
    operators in logical expressions to either Fortran or C-style.
    .lt.  <-->  <
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class F90Aligner. (8)
    Open

    class F90Aligner(object):
    """
    Alignment of continuations of a broken line,
    based on the following heuristics:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function reformat_ffile has 17 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def reformat_ffile(infile, outfile, impose_indent=True, indent_size=3, strict_indent=False, impose_whitespace=True,
    Severity: Major
    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Function reformat_ffile_combined has 17 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def reformat_ffile_combined(infile, outfile, impose_indent=True, indent_size=3, strict_indent=False, impose_whitespace=True,
      Severity: Major
      Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Function inspect_ffile_format has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def inspect_ffile_format(infile, indent_size, strict_indent, indent_fypp=False, orig_filename=None):
    """
    Determine indentation by inspecting original Fortran file.

    This is mainly for finding aligned blocks of DO/IF statements.
        Severity: Minor
        Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function remove_pre_ampersands. (7)
        Open

        def remove_pre_ampersands(lines, is_special, filename, line_nr):
    """
    remove and return preceding ampersands ('pre_ampersand'). Also return
    number of whitespace characters before ampersand of previous line
    ('ampersand_sep').
        Severity: Minor
        Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method process_lines_of_fline. (7)
        Open

            def process_lines_of_fline(self, f_line, lines, rel_ind, line_nr):
        """
        process all lines that belong to a Fortran line `f_line`,
        `rel_ind` is the relative indentation size.
        """
        Severity: Minor
        Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
        Open

                        if ((not re.search((r"(" + DEL_OPEN_STR +
                                    r"|[\w\*/=\+\-:])\s*$"),
                                   line[:pos], RE_FLAGS) and
                     not EMPTY_RE.search(line[:pos])) or
                        re.search(SOL_STR + r"(\w+\s*:)?(ELSE)?\s*IF\s*$",
        Severity: Critical
        Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

          Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class plusminus_parser. (6)
          Open

          class plusminus_parser(parser_re):
    """parser for +/- in addition
    """
    def __init__(self, regex):
        self._re = regex
          Severity: Minor
          Found in fprettify/__init__.py by radon

          Cyclomatic Complexity

          Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

          Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

          Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
          if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
          elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
          else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
          for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
          while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
          except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
          finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
          with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
          assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
          Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
          Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

          Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

          Function format_single_fline has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def format_single_fline(f_line, whitespace, whitespace_dict, linebreak_pos,
                        ampersand_sep, scope_parser, format_decl, filename, line_nr,
                        auto_format=True):
    """
    format a single Fortran line - imposes white space formatting
          Severity: Minor
          Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function split_reformatted_line has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def split_reformatted_line(line_orig, linebreak_pos_orig, ampersand_sep, line, filename, line_nr):
    """
    Infer linebreak positions of formatted line from linebreak positions in
    original line and split line.
    """
          Severity: Minor
          Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function write_formatted_line has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def write_formatted_line(outfile, indent, lines, orig_lines, indent_special, llength, use_same_line, is_omp_conditional, label, filename, line_nr):
          Severity: Major
          Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

            Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
            Open

                        if not level and not is_decl and char == '=' and not REL_OP_RE.search(
                    line[max(0, pos - 1):min(pos + 2, len(line))]):
                        # should only have one assignment per line!
                if pos_eq > 0:
                    raise FprettifyInternalException(
            Severity: Critical
            Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

              Function remove_pre_ampersands has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              def remove_pre_ampersands(lines, is_special, filename, line_nr):
    """
    remove and return preceding ampersands ('pre_ampersand'). Also return
    number of whitespace characters before ampersand of previous line
    ('ampersand_sep').
              Severity: Minor
              Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Function format_single_fline has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              def format_single_fline(f_line, whitespace, whitespace_dict, linebreak_pos,
              Severity: Major
              Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

                Function get_linebreak_pos has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                def get_linebreak_pos(lines, filter_fypp=True):
    """extract linebreak positions in Fortran line from lines"""
    linebreak_pos = []
    if filter_fypp:
        notfortran_re = NOTFORTRAN_LINE_RE
                Severity: Minor
                Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function reformat_inplace has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                def reformat_inplace(filename, stdout=False, diffonly=False, **kwargs):  # pragma: no cover
    """reformat a file in place."""
    if filename == '-':
        infile = io.StringIO()
        infile.write(sys.stdin.read())
                Severity: Minor
                Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function format_comments has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                def format_comments(lines, comments, strip_comments):
    comments_ftd = []
    for line, comment in zip(lines, comments):
        has_comment = bool(comment.strip())
        if has_comment:
                Severity: Minor
                Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function process_lines_of_fline has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    def process_lines_of_fline(self, f_line, lines, rel_ind, rel_ind_con,
                Severity: Major
                Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 50 mins to fix

                  Function split_reformatted_line has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  def split_reformatted_line(line_orig, linebreak_pos_orig, ampersand_sep, line, filename, line_nr):
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 45 mins to fix

                    Function add_whitespace_charwise has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                    def add_whitespace_charwise(line, spacey, scope_parser, format_decl, filename, line_nr):
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 45 mins to fix

                      Function preprocess_line has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                      def preprocess_line(f_line, lines, comments, filename, line_nr, indent_fypp):
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 45 mins to fix

                        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                        Open

                                                if len(scopes) > 0:
                            what = scopes.pop()

        # deal with line breaks
        if not manual_lines_indent:
                        Severity: Major
                        Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 45 mins to fix

                          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                          Open

                                              if part2.strip() and not (part2 == '\n' or STR_OPEN_RE.match(part2)):
                        ok = (part2 == '(')
                        break
                if ok:
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 45 mins to fix

                            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                            Open

                                                    if EMPTY_RE.search(line[pos+1:]):
                            return True
                        else:
                            return False
                    else:
                            Severity: Major
                            Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 45 mins to fix

                              Function inspect_ffile_format has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                              def inspect_ffile_format(infile, indent_size, strict_indent, indent_fypp=False, orig_filename=None):
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 35 mins to fix

                                Function __align_line_continuations has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                    def __align_line_continuations(self, line, is_decl, is_use, indent_size, line_nr):
                                Severity: Minor
                                Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 35 mins to fix

                                  Function parse_fprettify_directives has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                  def parse_fprettify_directives(lines, comment_lines, in_format_off_block, filename, line_nr):
                                  Severity: Minor
                                  Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 35 mins to fix

                                    Function append_comments has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                    def append_comments(lines, comment_lines, is_special):
    """append comments to lines"""
    for pos, (line, comment) in enumerate(zip(lines, comment_lines)):
        if pos < len(lines) - 1:
            has_nl = True  # has next line
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py - About 35 mins to fix

                                    Cognitive Complexity

                                    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                                    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                                    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                                    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                                    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                                    Further reading

                                    FIXME found
                                    Open

                                    FIXME's
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by fixme

                                    FIXME found
                                    Open

                                                    # FIXME: duplication of regex, better to include them into
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py by fixme

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                        for pos, char in CharFilter(line):
        if pos > pos_prev + 1: # skipped string
            line_parts.append(line[pos_prev + 1:pos].strip()) # append string
            line_parts.append('')
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 2 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 911..918
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 960..967

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 83.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                            for pos, char in CharFilter(f_line):
            if pos > pos_prev + 1: # skipped string
                line_parts.append(f_line[pos_prev + 1:pos].strip()) # append string
                line_parts.append('')
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 2 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 960..967
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1279..1286

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 83.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                        for pos, char in CharFilter(f_line):
        if pos > pos_prev + 1: # skipped string
            line_parts.append(f_line[pos_prev + 1:pos].strip()) # append string
            line_parts.append('')
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 2 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 911..918
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1279..1286

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 83.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                            line_ftd = (lhs.rstrip(' ') +
                    ' ' * spacey[1] + assign_op +
                    ' ' * spacey[1] + rhs.lstrip(' '))
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1205..1209

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 65.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                                line_ftd = lhs.rstrip(' ') \
                    + ' ' * spacey[7] \
                    + char \
                    + ' ' * spacey[7] \
                    + rhs.lstrip(' ')
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1250..1252

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 65.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                        if pos + 1 < len(line):
        line_parts.append(line[pos + 1:])
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 920..921
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 969..970

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 41.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                            if pos + 1 < len(f_line):
            line_parts.append(f_line[pos + 1:])
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 969..970
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1288..1289

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 41.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                        if pos + 1 < len(f_line):
        line_parts.append(f_line[pos + 1:])
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 920..921
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1288..1289

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 41.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                            if indent_special != 3:
            indent = [0] * len(lines)
        else:
            indent = [len(l) - len((l.lstrip(' ')).lstrip('&'))  for l in lines]
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1829..1830

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 39.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                        manual_lines_indent = [
        len(l) - len(l.lstrip(' ').lstrip('&')) for l in lines]
                                    Severity: Major
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1520..1523

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 39.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                    PREPRO_NEW_SCOPE = [parser_re(FYPP_DEF_RE), parser_re(FYPP_IF_RE), parser_re(FYPP_FOR_RE),
                       parser_re(FYPP_BLOCK_RE), parser_re(FYPP_CALL_RE), parser_re(FYPP_MUTE_RE)]
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 235..237

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 36.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                    PREPRO_END_SCOPE = [parser_re(FYPP_ENDDEF_RE), parser_re(FYPP_ENDIF_RE), parser_re(FYPP_ENDFOR_RE),
                       parser_re(FYPP_ENDBLOCK_RE), parser_re(FYPP_ENDCALL_RE),
                       parser_re(FYPP_ENDMUTE_RE)]
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 232..233

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 36.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                    def reformat_ffile_combined(infile, outfile, impose_indent=True, indent_size=3, strict_indent=False, impose_whitespace=True,
                            case_dict={},
                            impose_replacements=False, cstyle=False, whitespace=2, whitespace_dict={}, llength=132,
                            strip_comments=False, format_decl=False, orig_filename=None, indent_fypp=True, indent_mod=True):
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1419..1422

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 35.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                    def reformat_ffile(infile, outfile, impose_indent=True, indent_size=3, strict_indent=False, impose_whitespace=True,
                   case_dict={},
                   impose_replacements=False, cstyle=False, whitespace=2, whitespace_dict={}, llength=132,
                   strip_comments=False, format_decl=False, orig_filename=None, indent_fypp=True, indent_mod=True):
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1464..1467

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 35.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                                if not os.path.exists(directory):
                sys.stderr.write("directory " + directory +
                                 " does not exist!\n")
                sys.exit(1)
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 2063..2065

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 33.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                                if not os.path.isfile(directory) and directory != '-' and not args.recursive:
                sys.stderr.write("file " + directory + " does not exist!\n")
                sys.exit(1)
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 2059..2062

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 33.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                                log_message(LINESPLIT_MESSAGE+" (limit: "+str(llength)+")", "warning",
                        filename, line_nr)
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1878..1879

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 32.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                    Open

                                                log_message(LINESPLIT_MESSAGE+" (limit: "+str(llength)+")", "warning",
                        filename, line_nr)
                                    Severity: Minor
                                    Found in fprettify/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                                    fprettify/__init__.py on lines 1874..1875

                                    Duplicated Code

                                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                    Tuning

                                    This issue has a mass of 32.

                                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                    Refactorings

                                    Further Reading

                                    There are no issues that match your filters.

                                    Category
                                    Status