Sign upLogin

publiclab/plots2

View on GitHub
Star
app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

            redirect_to Node.find(@node.power_tag('abtest')).path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

      redirect_to @node.path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

      redirect_to @node.path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

    redirect_to node.path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

        redirect_to @node.path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

        redirect_to Node.find_by(slug: @node.power_tag('redirect')).path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

      redirect_to @node.path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

      redirect_to Node.find_wiki(params[:id]).path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

      redirect_to @node.path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

Possible unprotected redirect
Open

        redirect_to Node.find(@node.power_tag('redirect')).path
Severity: Critical
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by brakeman

Unvalidated redirects and forwards are #10 on the OWASP Top Ten.

Redirects which rely on user-supplied values can be used to "spoof" websites or hide malicious links in otherwise harmless-looking URLs. They can also allow access to restricted areas of a site if the destination is not validated.

Brakeman will raise warnings whenever redirect_to appears to be used with a user-supplied value that may allow them to change the :host option.

For example,

redirect_to params.merge(:action => :home)

will create a warning like

Possible unprotected redirect near line 46: redirect_to(params)

This is because params could contain :host => 'evilsite.com' which would redirect away from your site and to a malicious site.

If the first argument to redirect_to is a hash, then adding :only_path => true will limit the redirect to the current host. Another option is to specify the host explicitly.

redirect_to params.merge(:only_path => true)

redirect_to params.merge(:host => 'myhost.com')

If the first argument is a string, then it is possible to parse the string and extract the path:

redirect_to URI.parse(some_url).path

If the URL does not contain a protocol (e.g., http://), then you will probably get unexpected results, as redirect_to will prepend the current host name and a protocol.

File wiki_controller.rb has 444 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'rss'

class WikiController < ApplicationController
  before_action :require_user, only: %i(new create edit update delete replace)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 6 hrs to fix

Method show has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def show
    @node = if params[:lang]
              Node.find_wiki(params[:lang] + '/' + params[:id])
            else
              Node.find_wiki(params[:id])
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Class WikiController has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class WikiController < ApplicationController
  before_action :require_user, only: %i(new create edit update delete replace)

  def subdomain
    url = "//#{request.host}/wiki/"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Method create has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create
    if current_user.status == 1
      # we no longer allow custom urls, just titles which are parameterized automatically into urls
      # slug = params[:title].parameterize
      # slug = params[:id].parameterize if params[:id] != "" && !params[:id].nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method show has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def show
    @node = if params[:lang]
              Node.find_wiki(params[:lang] + '/' + params[:id])
            else
              Node.find_wiki(params[:id])
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Method replace has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def replace
    @node = Node.find(params[:id])
    if params[:before] && params[:after]
      # during round trip, strings are getting "\r\n" newlines converted to "\n",
      # so we're ensuring they remain "\r\n"; this may vary based on platform, unfortunately
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method methods has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def methods
    @nodes = Node.where(status: 1, type: %w(page))
      .where('term_data.name = ?', 'method')
      .includes(:revision, :tag)
      .references(:node_revision)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method new has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def new
    @revision = Revision.new
    if current_user &.first_time_poster
      flash[:notice] = "You can create a wiki once your research note/question has been approved by moderators. Click <a href='https://publiclab.org/notes/tester/04-23-2016/new-moderation-system-for-first-time-posters'>here</a> to learn why."
      redirect_to '/'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method create has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create
    if current_user.status == 1
      # we no longer allow custom urls, just titles which are parameterized automatically into urls
      # slug = params[:title].parameterize
      # slug = params[:id].parameterize if params[:id] != "" && !params[:id].nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method new has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def new
    @revision = Revision.new
    if current_user &.first_time_poster
      flash[:notice] = "You can create a wiki once your research note/question has been approved by moderators. Click <a href='https://publiclab.org/notes/tester/04-23-2016/new-moderation-system-for-first-time-posters'>here</a> to learn why."
      redirect_to '/'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

          if Random.rand(2) == 0
            redirect_to Node.find(@node.power_tag('abtest')).path
            return
          end
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Method revisions has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def revisions
    @node = Node.find_wiki(params[:id])
    if @node
      @revisions = @node.revisions
      @pagy_revisions, @revisions = pagy(@revisions.where(status: 1), items: 20) unless current_user&.can_moderate?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

        elsif current_user.can_moderate?
          flash.now[:warning] = "Only moderators and admins see this page, as it is redirected to #{Node.find(@node.power_tag('abtest')).title} roughly around 50% of the time.
        To remove this behavior, delete the tag beginning with 'abtest:'"
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Method update_node_attributes has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_node_attributes
    ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
      @node.vid = @revision.vid
      @node.title = @revision.title
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method revision has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def revision
    @node = Node.find_wiki(params[:id])
    if @node
      @tags = @node.tags
      @tagnames = @tags.collect(&:name)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method edit has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def edit
    @revision = Revision.new
    @node = if params[:lang]
              Node.find_wiki(params[:lang] + '/' + params[:id])
            else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if params[:topic]
      nids = @nodes.collect(&:nid) || []
      @notes = Node.where(status: 1, type: %w(page))
        .where('node.nid IN (?)', nids)
        .where('(type = "note" OR type = "page" OR type = "map") AND node.status = 1 AND (node.title LIKE ? OR node_revisions.title LIKE ? OR node_revisions.body LIKE ? OR term_data.name = ?)',
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb on lines 433..444

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if params[:topic]
      nids = @nodes.collect(&:nid) || []
      @nodes = Node.where(status: 1, type: %w(page))
        .where('node.nid IN (?)', nids)
        .where('(type = "note" OR type = "page" OR type = "map") AND node.status = 1 AND (node.title LIKE ? OR node_revisions.title LIKE ? OR node_revisions.body LIKE ? OR term_data.name = ?)',
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb on lines 420..431

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          '%' + params[:topic] + '%',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          '%' + params[:topic] + '%',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          '%' + params[:topic] + '%',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          params[:topic])
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          params[:topic])
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          '%' + params[:topic] + '%',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          '%' + params[:topic] + '%',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line.
Open

          '%' + params[:topic] + '%',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/wiki_controller.rb by rubocop

Here we check if the parameters on a multi-line method call or definition are aligned.

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfirstparameter (default)

# good

foo :bar,
    :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
  :baz

Example: EnforcedStyle: withfixedindentation

# good

foo :bar,
  :baz

# bad

foo :bar,
    :baz

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status