Sign upLogin

puma/puma

View on GitHub
Star
test/helper.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method skip_if has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def skip_if(*engs, suffix: '', bt: caller)
    engs.each do |eng|
      skip_msg = case eng
        when :linux       then "Skipped if Linux#{suffix}"       if Puma::IS_LINUX
        when :darwin      then "Skipped if darwin#{suffix}"      if Puma::IS_OSX
Severity: Minor
Found in test/helper.rb - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method skip_unless has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def skip_unless(eng, bt: caller)
    skip_msg = case eng
      when :linux   then "Skip unless Linux"            unless Puma::IS_LINUX
      when :darwin  then "Skip unless darwin"           unless Puma::IS_OSX
      when :jruby   then "Skip unless JRuby"            unless Puma::IS_JRUBY
Severity: Minor
Found in test/helper.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method aggregated_results has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def aggregated_results(io)
    is_github_actions = ENV['GITHUB_ACTIONS'] == 'true'
    filtered_results = results.dup

    if options[:verbose]
Severity: Minor
Found in test/helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method aggregated_results has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def aggregated_results(io)
    is_github_actions = ENV['GITHUB_ACTIONS'] == 'true'
    filtered_results = results.dup

    if options[:verbose]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in test/helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status