Sign upLogin

puppetlabs/facter-ng

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 200 of 200 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Linux
    class Ec2Metadata
      FACT_NAME = 'ec2_metadata'

      def call_the_resolver
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/linux/ec2_metadata.rb and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
lib/facts/linux/ec2_userdata.rb on lines 4..43

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 108.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Linux
    class Ec2Userdata
      FACT_NAME = 'ec2_userdata'

      def call_the_resolver
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/linux/ec2_userdata.rb and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
lib/facts/linux/ec2_metadata.rb on lines 4..43

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 108.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method which has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def which(bin)
          if absolute_path?(bin)
            return bin if File.executable?(bin)
          else
            search_paths.each do |dir|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/custom_facts/core/execution/windows.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Sles
    module Os
      module Distro
        class Release
          FACT_NAME = 'os.distro.release'
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/sles/os/distro/release.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
lib/facts/linux/os/distro/release.rb on lines 4..25
lib/facts/rhel/os/distro/release.rb on lines 4..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 78.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Rhel
    module Os
      module Distro
        class Release
          FACT_NAME = 'os.distro.release'
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/rhel/os/distro/release.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
lib/facts/linux/os/distro/release.rb on lines 4..25
lib/facts/sles/os/distro/release.rb on lines 4..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 78.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Linux
    module Os
      module Distro
        class Release
          FACT_NAME = 'os.distro.release'
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/linux/os/distro/release.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
lib/facts/rhel/os/distro/release.rb on lines 4..25
lib/facts/sles/os/distro/release.rb on lines 4..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 78.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method retrieve_from_other_directories has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def retrieve_from_other_directories(interface_name)
          DIRS.each do |dir|
            next unless File.readable?(dir)

            lease_files = Dir.entries(dir).select { |file| file =~ /dhclient.*\.lease/ }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/resolvers/networking_linux_resolver.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method search has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def search(json_data, searched_element, path)
      # we hit a dead end, the os was not found on this branch
      # and we cannot go deeper
      return unless json_data
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/framework/detector/os_hierarchy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method read_proc_status has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def read_proc_status
          proc_status_content = Facter::Util::FileHelper.safe_readlines('/proc/self/status', nil)
          return unless proc_status_content

          proc_status_content.each do |line|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/resolvers/open_vz.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method read_mounts has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def read_mounts # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize
            mounts = {}
            FilesystemHelper.read_mountpoints.each do |fs|
              device = fs.name
              filesystem = fs.mount_type
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/resolvers/macosx/mountpoints_resolver.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method deep_merge has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def deep_merge(left, right, path = [])
        ret = nil

        if left.is_a?(Hash) && right.is_a?(Hash)
          ret = left.merge(right) do |key, left_val, right_val|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/custom_facts/util/values.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieve_vserver has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def retrieve_vserver
          proc_status_content = Facter::Util::FileHelper.safe_readlines('/proc/self/status', nil)
          return unless proc_status_content

          proc_status_content.each do |line|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/resolvers/virt_what.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Resolvers
    class DMIComputerSystem < BaseResolver
      @log = Facter::Log.new(self)
      @semaphore = Mutex.new
      @fact_list ||= {}
Severity: Major
Found in lib/resolvers/windows/dmi_computersystem_resolver.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/resolvers/windows/dmi_bios_resolver.rb on lines 4..36

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 59.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Resolvers
    class DMIBios < BaseResolver
      @log = Facter::Log.new(self)
      @semaphore = Mutex.new
      @fact_list ||= {}
Severity: Major
Found in lib/resolvers/windows/dmi_bios_resolver.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/resolvers/windows/dmi_computersystem_resolver.rb on lines 4..35

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 59.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method load_env has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def load_env(fact = nil)
        # Load from the environment, if possible
        @environment_vars.each do |name, value|
          # Skip anything that doesn't match our regex.
          next unless name =~ /^facter_?(\w+)$/i
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/custom_facts/util/loader.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Solaris
    class Ssh
      FACT_NAME = 'ssh'

      def call_the_resolver
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/solaris/ssh.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/facts/linux/ssh.rb on lines 4..22
lib/facts/macosx/ssh.rb on lines 4..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Linux
    class Ssh
      FACT_NAME = 'ssh'

      def call_the_resolver
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/linux/ssh.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/facts/macosx/ssh.rb on lines 4..22
lib/facts/solaris/ssh.rb on lines 4..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Macosx
    class Ssh
      FACT_NAME = 'ssh'

      def call_the_resolver
Severity: Major
Found in lib/facts/macosx/ssh.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/facts/linux/ssh.rb on lines 4..22
lib/facts/solaris/ssh.rb on lines 4..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method build_release_facts has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def build_release_facts(fact_name)
          result = Util::FileHelper.safe_read('/etc/release', nil)
          return @fact_list[fact_name] = nil if result.nil?

          @os_version_regex_patterns.each do |os_version_regex|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/resolvers/solaris/solaris_os_release_resolver.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method prepended has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.prepended(receiver) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize
    exclude, print_caller = parse_options(ENV['API_DEBUG'])

    receiver_methods = receiver.instance_methods - Object.methods
    receiver_methods.each do |meth|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/util/api_debugger.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language