Showing 47 of 47 total issues
Method _resumable_put
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _resumable_put(bucket,
uptoken,
fh,
checksums,
progresses,
Method _generate_action_params
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _generate_action_params(local_file,
bucket,
key = nil,
mime_type = nil,
custom_meta = nil,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
rescue => e
Log.logger.warn "#{e.message} => Qiniu::HTTP.get('#{url}')"
if e.respond_to?(:response) && e.response.respond_to?(:code) then
return e.response.code, e.response.body, e.response.raw_headers
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
rescue => e
Log.logger.warn "#{e.message} => Qiniu::HTTP.post('#{url}')"
if e.respond_to?(:response) && e.response.respond_to?(:code) then
return e.response.code, e.response.body, e.response.raw_headers
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method resumable_upload_with_token
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resumable_upload_with_token(uptoken,
local_file,
bucket,
key = nil,
mime_type = nil,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _call_binary_with_token
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _call_binary_with_token(uptoken, url, data, content_type = nil, retry_times = 0)
Method upload_with_token_2
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_with_token_2(uptoken,
local_file,
key = nil,
x_vars = nil,
opts = {})
Method _putblock
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _putblock(uphost, uptoken, ctx, offset, body)
Method upload_with_put_policy
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_with_put_policy(put_policy,
local_file,
key = nil,
x_vars = nil,
opts = {})
Method upload_buffer_with_put_policy
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_buffer_with_put_policy(put_policy,
buf,
key = nil,
x_vars = nil,
opts = {})
Method initialize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(fpath, block_index, seek_pos, read_length, result_length)
Method _generate_cp_or_mv_opstr
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _generate_cp_or_mv_opstr(command, source_bucket, source_key, target_bucket, target_key)
Method upload_buffer_with_token
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_buffer_with_token(uptoken,
buf,
key = nil,
x_vars = nil,
opts = {})
Method initialize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(fpath, block_index, offset, restsize, block_size)
Method _call_binary_with_token
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _call_binary_with_token(uptoken, url, data, content_type = nil, retry_times = 0)
options = {
:headers => {
:content_type => 'application/octet-stream',
'Authorization' => 'UpToken ' + uptoken
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method authorize_download_url
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def authorize_download_url(url, args = EMPTY_ARGS)
### 提取AK/SK信息
access_key = Config.settings[:access_key]
secret_key = Config.settings[:secret_key]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _mkfile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _mkfile(uphost,
uptoken,
entry_uri,
fsize,
checksums,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def up_host(bucket, opts = {})
if !multi_region_support?
"#{extract_protocol(opts)}://up.qiniu.com"
elsif bucket
hosts(bucket)[extract_protocol(opts)]['up'][0] rescue "#{extract_protocol(opts)}://up.qiniu.com"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def fetch_host(bucket, opts = {})
if !multi_region_support?
"#{extract_protocol(opts)}://iovip.qbox.me"
elsif bucket
hosts(bucket)[extract_protocol(opts)]['io'][0] rescue "#{extract_protocol(opts)}://iovip.qbox.me"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_with_put_policy(put_policy,
local_file,
key = nil,
x_vars = nil,
opts = {})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76