Showing 135 of 135 total issues
Function string
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
string = function() {
var hex,
i,
string = '',
start = ch === '"' || ch === '\'' ? ch : '',
Function create
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modifier.create = function(filters, name, fn, ctx) {
if (_.isString(filters)) {
ctx = fn;
fn = name;
name = filters;
Function create
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modifier.create = function(filters, name, fn, ctx) {
if (_.isString(filters)) {
ctx = fn;
fn = name;
name = filters;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
n=Nr(n);for(var r=-1,e=t.length,u={};++r<e;){var o=t[r];o in n&&(u[o]=n[o])}return u}function Tr(n,t){var r={};return _t(n,function(n,e,u){t(n,e,u)&&(r[e]=n)}),r}function Ur(n){var t,r=Ln.support;if(!h(n)||Je.call(n)!=Y||Gn(n)||!(Ze.call(n,"constructor")||(t=n.constructor,typeof t!="function"||t instanceof t))||!r.argsTag&&ae(n))return false;var e;return r.ownLast?(_t(n,function(n,t,r){return e=Ze.call(r,t),false}),false!==e):(_t(n,function(n,t){e=t}),e===w||Ze.call(n,e))}function Wr(n){for(var t=de(n),r=t.length,e=r&&n.length,u=Ln.support,u=e&&Rr(e)&&(Uo(n)||u.nonEnumStrings&&_e(n)||u.nonEnumArgs&&ae(n)),o=-1,i=[];++o<r;){
Function generator
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modifier.generator = function(prevGenerator, name, args, ctx) {
var mod = all[name],
fn;
args = args || [];
Function _callDepend
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _callDepend(caller, pairStack) {
var pair = _.last(pairStack);
if (!pair) { throw new Error(caller + ' not a object.'); }
var node = pair.node;
Function _callDepend
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _callDepend(caller, pairStack) {
var pair = _.last(pairStack);
if (!pair) { throw new Error(caller + ' not a object.'); }
var node = pair.node;
Function generator
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modifier.generator = function(prevGenerator, name, args, ctx) {
var mod = all[name],
fn;
args = args || [];
Function exports
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (yod, assert, _) {
yod.type('All', function() { return 'all'; });
var data = yod({
Function lr
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
n(t,r,de)}}function ir(n){return function(t,r,e){return(typeof r!="function"||e!==w)&&(r=zt(r,e,3)),n(t,r)}}function ar(n){return function(t,r,e){return(t=u(t))&&(n?t:"")+sr(t,r,e)+(n?"":t)}}function fr(n){var t=ie(function(r,e){var u=v(e,t.placeholder);return _r(r,n,null,e,u)});return t}function cr(n,t){return function(r,e,u,o){var i=3>arguments.length;return typeof e=="function"&&o===w&&Uo(r)?n(r,e,u,i):Rt(r,mr(e,o,4),u,i,t)}}function lr(n,t,r,e,u,o,i,a,f,c){function l(){for(var b=arguments.length,j=b,O=Te(b);j--;)O[j]=arguments[j];
Function object
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
object = function() {
var key,
object = {};
if (ch === '{') {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
KVPairNode.prototype.findPairByKey = function(key) {
return _.find(this.kvPairs, function(pair) {
return pair.key === key;
});
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
KVPairNode.prototype.findPairByKey = function(key) {
return _.find(this.kvPairs, function(pair) {
return pair.key === key;
});
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function exports
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(yod, assert, _) {
var data = yod({
a: ['a'],
b: 'b',
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}function dr(n,t,r){var e=r?ku:Eu,u=e,o=u;return Bu(n,function(n,i,a){i=t(n,i,a),((r?i<u:i>u)||i===e&&i===o)&&(u=i,o=n)}),o}function mr(n,t,r){var e=Ln.callback||Ee,e=e===Ee?it:e;return r?e(n,t,r):e}function wr(n,t,e){var u=Ln.indexOf||Mr,u=u===Mr?r:u;return n?u(n,t,e):u}function br(n){var t=n.length,r=new n.constructor(t);return t&&"string"==typeof n[0]&&Ze.call(n,"index")&&(r.index=n.index,r.input=n.input),r}function xr(n){return n=n.constructor,typeof n=="function"&&n instanceof n||(n=Le),new n;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
var p="sourceURL"in t?"//# sourceURL="+t.sourceURL+"\n":"";if(n.replace(r,function(t,r,e,u,a,f){return e||(e=u),l+=n.slice(c,f).replace(Sn,s),r&&(o=true,l+="'+__e("+r+")+'"),a&&(i=true,l+="';"+a+";\n__p+='"),e&&(l+="'+((__t=("+e+"))==null?'':__t)+'"),c=f+t.length,t}),l+="';",(t=t.variable)||(l="with(obj){"+l+"}"),l=(i?l.replace(an,""):l).replace(fn,"$1").replace(cn,"$1;"),l="function("+(t||"obj")+"){"+(t?"":"obj||(obj={});")+"var __t,__p=''"+(o?",__e=_.escape":"")+(i?",__j=Array.prototype.join;function print(){__p+=__j.call(arguments,'')}":";")+l+"return __p}",
t=ti(function(){return Fe(a,p+"return "+l).apply(w,f)}),t.source=l,ce(t))throw t;return t},Ln.trim=je,Ln.trimLeft=function(n,t,r){var e=n;return(n=u(n))?n.slice((r?Er(e,t,r):null==t)?g(n):i(n,t+"")):n},Ln.trimRight=function(n,t,r){var e=n;return(n=u(n))?(r?Er(e,t,r):null==t)?n.slice(0,y(n)+1):n.slice(0,a(n,t+"")+1):n},Ln.trunc=function(n,t,r){r&&Er(n,t,r)&&(t=null);var e=C;if(r=T,null!=t)if(le(t)){var o="separator"in t?t.separator:o,e="length"in t?+t.length||0:e;r="omission"in t?u(t.omission):r}else e=+t||0;
Function _r
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return l}function sr(n,t,r){return n=n.length,t=+t,n<t&&du(t)?(t-=n,r=null==r?" ":r+"",Ae(r,tu(t/r.length)).slice(0,t)):""}function pr(n,t,r,e){function u(){for(var t=-1,a=arguments.length,f=-1,c=e.length,l=Te(a+c);++f<c;)l[f]=e[f];for(;a--;)l[f++]=arguments[++t];return(this&&this!==Zn&&this instanceof u?i:n).apply(o?r:this,l)}var o=t&x,i=Xt(n);return u}function hr(n){return function(t,r,e,u){var o=mr(e);return o===it&&null==e?Pt(t,r,n):Bt(t,r,o(e,u,1),n)}}function _r(n,t,r,e,u,o,i,a){var f=t&A;if(!f&&typeof n!="function")throw new ze(L);
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
return yt(n,de(n))}function de(n){if(null==n)return[];le(n)||(n=Le(n));for(var t=n.length,r=Ln.support,t=t&&Rr(t)&&(Uo(n)||r.nonEnumStrings&&_e(n)||r.nonEnumArgs&&ae(n))&&t||0,e=n.constructor,u=-1,e=Fo(e)&&e.prototype||qe,o=e===n,i=Te(t),a=0<t,f=r.enumErrorProps&&(n===De||n instanceof We),c=r.enumPrototypes&&Fo(n);++u<t;)i[u]=u+"";for(var l in n)c&&"prototype"==l||f&&("message"==l||"name"==l)||a&&Or(l,t)||"constructor"==l&&(o||!Ze.call(n,l))||i.push(l);if(r.nonEnumShadows&&n!==qe)for(t=n===Ke?G:n===De?q:Je.call(n),
r=Nu[t]||Nu[Y],t==Y&&(e=qe),t=Wn.length;t--;)l=Wn[t],u=r[l],o&&u||(u?!Ze.call(n,l):n[l]===e[l])||i.push(l);return i}function me(n){return Nt(n,Ko(n))}function we(n){return(n=u(n))&&n.replace(In,c).replace(xn,"")}function be(n){return(n=u(n))&&bn.test(n)?n.replace(wn,"\\$&"):n}function xe(n,t,r){return r&&Er(n,t,r)&&(t=0),ju(n,t)}function Ae(n,t){var r="";if(n=u(n),t=+t,1>t||!n||!du(t))return r;do t%2&&(r+=n),t=eu(t/2),n+=n;while(t);return r}function je(n,t,r){var e=n;return(n=u(n))?(r?Er(e,t,r):null==t)?n.slice(g(n),y(n)+1):(t+="",
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Ln.endsWith=function(n,t,r){n=u(n),t+="";var e=n.length;return r=r===w?e:bu(0>r?0:+r||0,e),r-=t.length,0<=r&&n.indexOf(t,r)==r},Ln.escape=function(n){return(n=u(n))&&hn.test(n)?n.replace(sn,l):n},Ln.escapeRegExp=be,Ln.every=Jr,Ln.find=fo,Ln.findIndex=Hu,Ln.findKey=Po,Ln.findLast=co,Ln.findLastIndex=Qu,Ln.findLastKey=Bo,Ln.findWhere=function(n,t){return fo(n,xt(t))},Ln.first=zr,Ln.get=function(n,t,r){return n=null==n?w:dt(n,$r(t),t+""),n===w?r:n},Ln.has=function(n,t){if(null==n)return false;var r=Ze.call(n,t);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return r}function a(n,t){for(var r=n.length;r--&&-1<t.indexOf(n.charAt(r)););return r}function f(t,r){return n(t.a,r.a)||t.b-r.b}function c(n){return Ln[n]}function l(n){return Pn[n]}function s(n){return"\\"+Mn[n]}function p(n,t,r){var e=n.length;for(t+=r?0:-1;r?t--:++t<e;){var u=n[t];if(u!==u)return t}return-1}function h(n){return!!n&&typeof n=="object"}function _(n){return 160>=n&&9<=n&&13>=n||32==n||160==n||5760==n||6158==n||8192<=n&&(8202>=n||8232==n||8233==n||8239==n||8287==n||12288==n||65279==n);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76