Function setupSetter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 109 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func setupSetter(meta *Meta, fieldName string, record interface{}) {
nestedField := strings.Contains(fieldName, ".")
// Setup nested fields
if nestedField {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setupSetter
has 137 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func setupSetter(meta *Meta, fieldName string, record interface{}) {
nestedField := strings.Contains(fieldName, ".")
// Setup nested fields
if nestedField {
File meta.go
has 525 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package resource
import (
"database/sql"
"errors"
Function setupValuer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func setupValuer(meta *Meta, fieldName string, record interface{}) {
nestedField := strings.Contains(fieldName, ".")
// Setup nested fields
if nestedField {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function HandleManyToMany
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleManyToMany(context *qor.Context, scope *gorm.Scope, meta *Meta, record interface{}, metaValue *MetaValue, field reflect.Value, fieldHasVersion bool) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if len(relationship.ForeignFieldNames) == 1 {
HandleBelongsTo(context, recordAsValue, field, relationship, primaryKeys)
}
Function HandleVersioningBelongsTo
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleVersioningBelongsTo(context *qor.Context, record reflect.Value, field reflect.Value, relationship *gorm.Relationship, primaryKeys []string, fieldHasVersion bool) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if metaValue.Value == nil {
primaryKeys = []string{}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (relationship.Kind == "has_one" || relationship.Kind == "belongs_to") && context.GetDB().NewScope(f.Field.Interface()).PrimaryKeyZero() {
if f.Field.Kind() == reflect.Ptr && f.Field.IsNil() {
f.Field.Set(reflect.New(f.Field.Type().Elem()))
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if len(relationship.ForeignFieldNames) == 2 {
HandleVersioningBelongsTo(context, recordAsValue, field, relationship, primaryKeys, fieldHasVersion)
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if _, ok := field.Addr().Interface().(*time.Time); ok {
meta.Setter = commonSetter(func(field reflect.Value, metaValue *MetaValue, context *qor.Context, record interface{}) {
if str := utils.ToString(metaValue.Value); str != "" {
if newTime, err := utils.ParseTime(str, context); err == nil {
field.Set(reflect.ValueOf(newTime))
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if err := scanner.Scan(utils.ToString(metaValue.Value)); err != nil {
context.AddError(err)
return
}
Function setupSetter
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func setupSetter(meta *Meta, fieldName string, record interface{}) {
nestedField := strings.Contains(fieldName, ".")
// Setup nested fields
if nestedField {
Function switchRecordToNewVersionIfNeeded
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func switchRecordToNewVersionIfNeeded(context *qor.Context, record interface{}) interface{} {
if context.Request == nil {
return record
}
Function HandleBelongsTo
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleBelongsTo(context *qor.Context, record reflect.Value, field reflect.Value, relationship *gorm.Relationship, primaryKeys []string) {
Function HandleNormalManyToMany
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleNormalManyToMany(context *qor.Context, field reflect.Value, metaValue *MetaValue, fieldHasVersion bool, compositePKeyConvertErr error) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
type Meta struct {
Name string
FieldName string
FieldStruct *gorm.StructField
Setter func(resource interface{}, metaValue *MetaValue, context *qor.Context)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case reflect.Int, reflect.Int8, reflect.Int16, reflect.Int32, reflect.Int64:
meta.Setter = commonSetter(func(field reflect.Value, metaValue *MetaValue, context *qor.Context, record interface{}) {
field.SetInt(utils.ToInt(metaValue.Value))
})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case reflect.Uint, reflect.Uint8, reflect.Uint16, reflect.Uint32, reflect.Uint64:
meta.Setter = commonSetter(func(field reflect.Value, metaValue *MetaValue, context *qor.Context, record interface{}) {
field.SetUint(utils.ToUint(metaValue.Value))
})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if reflect.TypeOf([]string{}).ConvertibleTo(field.Type()) {
meta.Setter = commonSetter(func(field reflect.Value, metaValue *MetaValue, context *qor.Context, record interface{}) {
field.Set(reflect.ValueOf(utils.ToArray(metaValue.Value)).Convert(field.Type()))
})
} else if _, ok := field.Addr().Interface().(*time.Time); ok {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if reflect.TypeOf("").ConvertibleTo(field.Type()) {
meta.Setter = commonSetter(func(field reflect.Value, metaValue *MetaValue, context *qor.Context, record interface{}) {
field.Set(reflect.ValueOf(utils.ToString(metaValue.Value)).Convert(field.Type()))
})
} else if reflect.TypeOf([]string{}).ConvertibleTo(field.Type()) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
exported function HandleBelongsTo should have comment or be unexported Open
func HandleBelongsTo(context *qor.Context, record reflect.Value, field reflect.Value, relationship *gorm.Relationship, primaryKeys []string) {
- Exclude checks
exported function CollectPrimaryKeys should have comment or be unexported Open
func CollectPrimaryKeys(metaValueForCompositePrimaryKeys []string) (compositePKeys []CompositePrimaryKeyStruct, compositePKeyConvertErr error) {
- Exclude checks
exported function HandleManyToMany should have comment or be unexported Open
func HandleManyToMany(context *qor.Context, scope *gorm.Scope, meta *Meta, record interface{}, metaValue *MetaValue, field reflect.Value, fieldHasVersion bool) {
- Exclude checks
comment on exported const CompositePrimaryKeyFieldName should be of the form "CompositePrimaryKeyFieldName ..." Open
// CompositePrimaryKey the string that represents the composite primary key
- Exclude checks
exported function HandleVersioningBelongsTo should have comment or be unexported Open
func HandleVersioningBelongsTo(context *qor.Context, record reflect.Value, field reflect.Value, relationship *gorm.Relationship, primaryKeys []string, fieldHasVersion bool) {
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
package resource
- Exclude checks