Showing 402 of 402 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ano in anos:
if ano.find("e") == -1:
anos2.append(ano)
else:
ano1, e, ano2 = ano.partition("e")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class DbDumperJob(CronJobBase):
"""Executado segunda às 4h"""
RUN_AT_TIMES = ['04:00']
schedule = Schedule(run_at_times=RUN_AT_TIMES)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function tinyValidator
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.tinyValidator = function(options){
var defaults = {
emptyMsg: "This is a required field.",
emailMsg: "Type a valid email address e.g. <code>john@domain.com</code>",
urlMsg: " Type proper url with \
Function plot_data
has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function plot_data() {
$("#controle").empty();
$("#graficoplenaria").empty();
`` has 31 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend(jQuery.easing,{def: 'easeOutQuad',swing: function(x,t,b,c,d){return jQuery.easing[jQuery.easing.def](x, t, b, c, d);},easeInQuad:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t+b;},easeOutQuad:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c *(t/=d)*(t-2)+b;},easeInOutQuad:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*t*t + b;return -c/2*((--t)*(t-2)-1)+b;},easeInCubic:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t*t+b;},easeOutCubic:function(x,t,b,c,d){ return c*((t=t/d-1)*t*t+1)+b;},easeInOutCubic:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1) return c/2*t*t*t+b;return c/2*((t-=2)*t*t+2)+b;},easeInQuart:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t*t*t+b;},easeOutQuart:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c*((t=t/d-1)*t*t*t-1)+b;},easeInOutQuart:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*t*t*t*t+b;return -c/2*((t-=2)*t*t*t-2)+b;},easeInQuint:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t*t*t*t+b;},easeOutQuint:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*((t=t/d-1)*t*t*t*t+1)+b;},easeInOutQuint:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*t*t*t*t*t+b;return c/2*((t-=2)*t*t*t*t+2)+b;},easeInSine:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c*Math.cos(t/d*(Math.PI/2))+c+b;},easeOutSine:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*Math.sin(t/d*(Math.PI/2))+b;},easeInOutSine:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c/2*(Math.cos(Math.PI*t/d)-1)+b;},easeInExpo:function(x,t,b,c,d){return (t==0)?b:c*Math.pow(2,10*(t/d-1))+b;},easeOutExpo:function(x,t,b,c,d){return (t==d)?b+c:c*(-Math.pow(2,-10*t/d)+1)+b;},easeInOutExpo:function(x,t,b,c,d){if(t==0)return b;if(t==d)return b+c;if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*Math.pow(2,10*(t-1))+b;return c/2*(-Math.pow(2,-10*--t)+2)+b;}, easeInCirc:function(x, t, b, c, d){return -c*(Math.sqrt(1-(t/=d)*t)-1)+b;},easeOutCirc:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*Math.sqrt(1-(t=t/d-1)*t)+b;},easeInOutCirc:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return -c/2*(Math.sqrt(1-t*t)-1)+b;return c/2*(Math.sqrt(1-(t-=2)*t)+1)+b;},easeInElastic:function(x,t,b,c,d){var s=1.70158;var p=0;var a=c;if(t==0)return b;if((t/=d)==1)return b+c;if(!p)p=d*.3;if(a<Math.abs(c)){a=c;var s=p/4;}else var s=p/(2*Math.PI)*Math.asin(c/a);return -(a*Math.pow(2,10*(t-=1))*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p))+b;},easeOutElastic:function(x,t,b,c,d){var s=1.70158;var p=0;var a=c;if(t==0)return b;if((t/=d)==1)return b+c;if(!p)p=d*.3;if(a<Math.abs(c)){a=c;var s=p/4;}else var s=p/(2*Math.PI)*Math.asin(c/a);return a*Math.pow(2,-10*t)*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p)+c+b;},easeInOutElastic:function(x,t,b,c,d){var s=1.70158;var p=0;var a=c;if(t==0)return b;if((t/=d/2)==2)return b+c;if(!p)p=d*(.3*1.5);if(a<Math.abs(c)){a=c;var s=p/4;}else var s=p/(2*Math.PI)*Math.asin(c/a);if(t<1)return -.5*(a*Math.pow(2,10*(t-=1))*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p))+b;return a*Math.pow(2,-10*(t-=1))*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p)*.5+c+b;},easeInBack:function(x,t,b,c,d,s){if(s==undefined)s=1.70158;return c*(t/=d)*t*((s+1)*t-s)+b;},easeOutBack:function(x,t,b,c,d,s){if(s==undefined)s=1.70158;return c*((t=t/d-1)*t*((s+1)*t+s)+1)+b;},easeInOutBack:function(x,t,b,c,d,s){if(s==undefined)s=1.70158;if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*(t*t*(((s*=(1.525))+1)*t-s))+b;return c/2*((t-=2)*t*(((s*=(1.525))+1)*t+s)+2)+b;},easeInBounce:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c-jQuery.easing.easeOutBounce(x,d-t,0,c,d)+b;},easeOutBounce:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d)<(1/2.75)){return c*(7.5625*t*t)+b;}else if(t<(2/2.75)){return c*(7.5625*(t-=(1.5/2.75))*t+.75)+b;}else if(t<(2.5/2.75)){return c*(7.5625*(t-=(2.25/2.75))*t+.9375)+b;}else{return c*(7.5625*(t-=(2.625/2.75))*t+.984375)+b;}},easeInOutBounce:function(x,t,b,c,d){if(t<d/2)return jQuery.easing.easeInBounce(x,t*2,0,c,d)*.5+b;return jQuery.easing.easeOutBounce(x,t*2-d,0,c,d)*.5+c*.5+b;}});
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def converte_data(self, data_str):
"""Converte string "d/m/a para objeto datetime;
retona None se data_str é inválido"""
DATA_REGEX = '(\d\d?)/(\d\d?)/(\d{4})'
res = re.match(DATA_REGEX, data_str)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def _converte_data(data_str):
"""Converte string 'd/m/a' para objeto datetime.date;
retona None se data_str é inválido
"""
DATA_REGEX = '(\d\d?)/(\d\d?)/(\d{4})'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function easySlider
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.easySlider = function(options){
return this.each(function(index){
var defaults = {
Function desenhar
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function desenhar(partido){
d3.json("/static/files/codes/js/genero_historia_partidos.json", function(error, data) {
File sen.py
has 304 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# Copyright (C) 2012, Leonardo Leite
#
# This file is part of Radar Parlamentar.
#
# Radar Parlamentar is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
Function desenhar
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function desenhar(legislatura){
d3.json("/static/files/codes/js/genero_comparativo_partidos.json", function(error, passa_dados) {
dados = passa_dados[legislatura];
data = [];
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _data_inicio_prox_periodo. (14) Open
def _data_inicio_prox_periodo(self, data_inicio_periodo):
# TODO tb extrair e fazer testes
# dia
dia_inicial = 1
# mês
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@classmethod
def _list_chefes_do_periodo(self, ap):
list_chefes = []
for chefe in ap.chefes_executivos:
dict_chefe = {}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@classmethod
def _list_votacoes_do_periodo(self, ap):
list_votacoes = []
for votacao in ap.votacoes:
dict_votacao = {}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def write_csv(self):
filepath = os.path.join(MODULE_DIR, 'saida', CSV_FILE)
with open(filepath, 'w') as f:
writer = csv.writer(f, delimiter=',')
writer.writerows(self.csv_rows)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def write_csv(self):
filepath = os.path.join(MODULE_DIR, 'saida', CSV_FILE)
with open(filepath, 'w') as f:
writer = csv.writer(f, delimiter=',')
writer.writerows(self.csv_rows)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
ImportadorVotacoesSenado
has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ImportadorVotacoesSenado:
"""Salva os dados dos arquivos XML do senado no banco de dados"""
def __init__(self):
Function _data_inicio_prox_periodo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _data_inicio_prox_periodo(self, data_inicio_periodo):
# TODO tb extrair e fazer testes
# dia
dia_inicial = 1
# mês
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File grafico.py
has 272 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# Copyright (C) 2012, Leonardo Leite, Saulo Trento, Diego Rabatone
#
# This file is part of Radar Parlamentar.
#
# Radar Parlamentar is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_chefe_periodo. (10) Open
@staticmethod
def get_chefe_periodo(ano_inicio, ano_fim, chefes_executivo):
chefes = []
for chefe in chefes_executivo:
ano_inicio_valido = (ano_inicio >= chefe.mandato_ano_inicio) and (
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |