radar-parlamentar/radar

View on GitHub

Showing 402 of 402 total issues

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for ano in anos:
                if ano.find("e") == -1:
                    anos2.append(ano)
                else:
                    ano1, e, ano2 = ano.partition("e")
radar_parlamentar/importadores/camara_genero/genero_comparativo_partidos.py on lines 37..43
radar_parlamentar/importadores/camara_genero/num_genero_legis.py on lines 37..43

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 87.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class DbDumperJob(CronJobBase):
    """Executado segunda às 4h"""

    RUN_AT_TIMES = ['04:00']
    schedule = Schedule(run_at_times=RUN_AT_TIMES)
Severity: Major
Found in radar_parlamentar/cron/jobs.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
radar_parlamentar/cron/jobs.py on lines 89..103

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 87.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function tinyValidator has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    jQuery.fn.tinyValidator = function(options){
        var defaults = {
            emptyMsg: "This is a required field.",
            emailMsg: "Type a valid email address e.g. <code>john@domain.com</code>",
            urlMsg: "   Type proper url with \
Severity: Major
Found in radar_parlamentar/radar_parlamentar/static/files/codes/js/init.js - About 5 hrs to fix

    Function plot_data has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        function plot_data() {
    
            $("#controle").empty();
            $("#graficoplenaria").empty();
    
    
    Severity: Major
    Found in radar_parlamentar/radar_parlamentar/static/files/codes/js/plenaria.js - About 3 hrs to fix

      `` has 31 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      jQuery.extend(jQuery.easing,{def: 'easeOutQuad',swing: function(x,t,b,c,d){return jQuery.easing[jQuery.easing.def](x, t, b, c, d);},easeInQuad:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t+b;},easeOutQuad:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c *(t/=d)*(t-2)+b;},easeInOutQuad:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*t*t + b;return -c/2*((--t)*(t-2)-1)+b;},easeInCubic:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t*t+b;},easeOutCubic:function(x,t,b,c,d){       return c*((t=t/d-1)*t*t+1)+b;},easeInOutCubic:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1) return c/2*t*t*t+b;return c/2*((t-=2)*t*t+2)+b;},easeInQuart:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t*t*t+b;},easeOutQuart:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c*((t=t/d-1)*t*t*t-1)+b;},easeInOutQuart:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*t*t*t*t+b;return -c/2*((t-=2)*t*t*t-2)+b;},easeInQuint:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*(t/=d)*t*t*t*t+b;},easeOutQuint:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*((t=t/d-1)*t*t*t*t+1)+b;},easeInOutQuint:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*t*t*t*t*t+b;return c/2*((t-=2)*t*t*t*t+2)+b;},easeInSine:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c*Math.cos(t/d*(Math.PI/2))+c+b;},easeOutSine:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*Math.sin(t/d*(Math.PI/2))+b;},easeInOutSine:function(x,t,b,c,d){return -c/2*(Math.cos(Math.PI*t/d)-1)+b;},easeInExpo:function(x,t,b,c,d){return (t==0)?b:c*Math.pow(2,10*(t/d-1))+b;},easeOutExpo:function(x,t,b,c,d){return (t==d)?b+c:c*(-Math.pow(2,-10*t/d)+1)+b;},easeInOutExpo:function(x,t,b,c,d){if(t==0)return b;if(t==d)return b+c;if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*Math.pow(2,10*(t-1))+b;return c/2*(-Math.pow(2,-10*--t)+2)+b;}, easeInCirc:function(x, t, b, c, d){return -c*(Math.sqrt(1-(t/=d)*t)-1)+b;},easeOutCirc:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c*Math.sqrt(1-(t=t/d-1)*t)+b;},easeInOutCirc:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d/2)<1)return -c/2*(Math.sqrt(1-t*t)-1)+b;return c/2*(Math.sqrt(1-(t-=2)*t)+1)+b;},easeInElastic:function(x,t,b,c,d){var s=1.70158;var p=0;var a=c;if(t==0)return b;if((t/=d)==1)return b+c;if(!p)p=d*.3;if(a<Math.abs(c)){a=c;var s=p/4;}else var s=p/(2*Math.PI)*Math.asin(c/a);return -(a*Math.pow(2,10*(t-=1))*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p))+b;},easeOutElastic:function(x,t,b,c,d){var s=1.70158;var p=0;var a=c;if(t==0)return b;if((t/=d)==1)return b+c;if(!p)p=d*.3;if(a<Math.abs(c)){a=c;var s=p/4;}else var s=p/(2*Math.PI)*Math.asin(c/a);return a*Math.pow(2,-10*t)*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p)+c+b;},easeInOutElastic:function(x,t,b,c,d){var s=1.70158;var p=0;var a=c;if(t==0)return b;if((t/=d/2)==2)return b+c;if(!p)p=d*(.3*1.5);if(a<Math.abs(c)){a=c;var s=p/4;}else var s=p/(2*Math.PI)*Math.asin(c/a);if(t<1)return -.5*(a*Math.pow(2,10*(t-=1))*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p))+b;return a*Math.pow(2,-10*(t-=1))*Math.sin((t*d-s)*(2*Math.PI)/p)*.5+c+b;},easeInBack:function(x,t,b,c,d,s){if(s==undefined)s=1.70158;return c*(t/=d)*t*((s+1)*t-s)+b;},easeOutBack:function(x,t,b,c,d,s){if(s==undefined)s=1.70158;return c*((t=t/d-1)*t*((s+1)*t+s)+1)+b;},easeInOutBack:function(x,t,b,c,d,s){if(s==undefined)s=1.70158;if((t/=d/2)<1)return c/2*(t*t*(((s*=(1.525))+1)*t-s))+b;return c/2*((t-=2)*t*(((s*=(1.525))+1)*t+s)+2)+b;},easeInBounce:function(x,t,b,c,d){return c-jQuery.easing.easeOutBounce(x,d-t,0,c,d)+b;},easeOutBounce:function(x,t,b,c,d){if((t/=d)<(1/2.75)){return c*(7.5625*t*t)+b;}else if(t<(2/2.75)){return c*(7.5625*(t-=(1.5/2.75))*t+.75)+b;}else if(t<(2.5/2.75)){return c*(7.5625*(t-=(2.25/2.75))*t+.9375)+b;}else{return c*(7.5625*(t-=(2.625/2.75))*t+.984375)+b;}},easeInOutBounce:function(x,t,b,c,d){if(t<d/2)return jQuery.easing.easeInBounce(x,t*2,0,c,d)*.5+b;return jQuery.easing.easeOutBounce(x,t*2-d,0,c,d)*.5+c*.5+b;}});
      Severity: Minor
      Found in radar_parlamentar/radar_parlamentar/static/files/codes/js/init.js - About 3 hrs to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def converte_data(self, data_str):
                """Converte string "d/m/a para objeto datetime;
                retona None se data_str é inválido"""
                DATA_REGEX = '(\d\d?)/(\d\d?)/(\d{4})'
                res = re.match(DATA_REGEX, data_str)
        Severity: Major
        Found in radar_parlamentar/importadores/cmsp.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
        radar_parlamentar/importadores/cdep.py on lines 266..277

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 69.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def _converte_data(data_str):
            """Converte string 'd/m/a' para objeto datetime.date;
            retona None se data_str é inválido
            """
            DATA_REGEX = '(\d\d?)/(\d\d?)/(\d{4})'
        Severity: Major
        Found in radar_parlamentar/importadores/cdep.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
        radar_parlamentar/importadores/cmsp.py on lines 106..116

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 69.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Function easySlider has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            $.fn.easySlider = function(options){
        
                return this.each(function(index){
        
                var defaults = {
        Severity: Major
        Found in radar_parlamentar/radar_parlamentar/static/files/codes/js/init.js - About 3 hrs to fix

          Function desenhar has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          function desenhar(partido){
              
          
              d3.json("/static/files/codes/js/genero_historia_partidos.json", function(error, data) {
          
          

            File sen.py has 304 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            # Copyright (C) 2012, Leonardo Leite
            #
            # This file is part of Radar Parlamentar.
            #
            # Radar Parlamentar is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
            Severity: Minor
            Found in radar_parlamentar/importadores/sen.py - About 3 hrs to fix

              Function desenhar has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              function desenhar(legislatura){
                  d3.json("/static/files/codes/js/genero_comparativo_partidos.json", function(error, passa_dados) {
              
                      dados = passa_dados[legislatura];
                      data = [];

                Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _data_inicio_prox_periodo. (14)
                Open

                    def _data_inicio_prox_periodo(self, data_inicio_periodo):
                        # TODO tb extrair e fazer testes
                        # dia
                        dia_inicial = 1
                        # mês
                Severity: Minor
                Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/utils.py by radon

                Cyclomatic Complexity

                Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

                Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

                Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
                if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
                elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
                else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
                for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
                while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
                except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
                finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
                with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
                assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
                Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
                Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

                Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    @classmethod
                    def _list_chefes_do_periodo(self, ap):
                        list_chefes = []
                        for chefe in ap.chefes_executivos:
                            dict_chefe = {}
                Severity: Major
                Found in radar_parlamentar/analises/grafico.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                radar_parlamentar/analises/grafico.py on lines 146..153

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 61.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    @classmethod
                    def _list_votacoes_do_periodo(self, ap):
                        list_votacoes = []
                        for votacao in ap.votacoes:
                            dict_votacao = {}
                Severity: Major
                Found in radar_parlamentar/analises/grafico.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                radar_parlamentar/analises/grafico.py on lines 155..162

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 61.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    def write_csv(self):
                        filepath = os.path.join(MODULE_DIR, 'saida', CSV_FILE)
                        with open(filepath, 'w') as f:
                            writer = csv.writer(f, delimiter=',')
                            writer.writerows(self.csv_rows)
                Severity: Major
                Found in radar_parlamentar/exportadores/exportador_csv.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                radar_parlamentar/exportadores/exportador_csv_r.py on lines 119..123

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 60.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    def write_csv(self):
                        filepath = os.path.join(MODULE_DIR, 'saida', CSV_FILE)
                        with open(filepath, 'w') as f:
                            writer = csv.writer(f, delimiter=',')
                            writer.writerows(self.csv_rows)
                Severity: Major
                Found in radar_parlamentar/exportadores/exportador_csv_r.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                radar_parlamentar/exportadores/exportador_csv.py on lines 113..117

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 60.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                ImportadorVotacoesSenado has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                class ImportadorVotacoesSenado:
                
                    """Salva os dados dos arquivos XML do senado no banco de dados"""
                
                    def __init__(self):
                Severity: Minor
                Found in radar_parlamentar/importadores/sen.py - About 2 hrs to fix

                  Function _data_inicio_prox_periodo has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def _data_inicio_prox_periodo(self, data_inicio_periodo):
                          # TODO tb extrair e fazer testes
                          # dia
                          dia_inicial = 1
                          # mês
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/utils.py - About 2 hrs to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  File grafico.py has 272 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  # Copyright (C) 2012, Leonardo Leite, Saulo Trento, Diego Rabatone
                  #
                  # This file is part of Radar Parlamentar.
                  #
                  # Radar Parlamentar is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in radar_parlamentar/analises/grafico.py - About 2 hrs to fix

                    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_chefe_periodo. (10)
                    Open

                        @staticmethod
                        def get_chefe_periodo(ano_inicio, ano_fim, chefes_executivo):
                            chefes = []
                            for chefe in chefes_executivo:
                                ano_inicio_valido = (ano_inicio >= chefe.mandato_ano_inicio) and (
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by radon

                    Cyclomatic Complexity

                    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

                    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

                    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
                    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
                    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
                    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
                    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
                    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
                    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
                    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
                    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
                    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
                    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
                    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

                    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

                    Severity
                    Category
                    Status
                    Source
                    Language