File `models.py` has 468 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# Copyright (C) 2012, Leonardo Leite, Eduardo Hideo, Saulo Trento,
#                     Diego Rabatone
#
# This file is part of Radar Parlamentar.
#

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_chefe_periodo. (10)
Open

    @staticmethod
    def get_chefe_periodo(ano_inicio, ano_fim, chefes_executivo):
        chefes = []
        for chefe in chefes_executivo:
            ano_inicio_valido = (ano_inicio >= chefe.mandato_ano_inicio) and (

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by radon

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct	Effect on CC	Reasoning
if	+1	An if statement is a single decision.
elif	+1	The elif statement adds another decision.
else	+0	The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for	+1	There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while	+1	There is a decision at the while statement.
except	+1	Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally	+0	The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with	+1	The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert	+1	The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension	+1	A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator	+1	Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method str. (7)
Open

    def __str__(self):
        data_string = ''
#       data_string = str(self.ini.year) # sempre começa com o ano
        delta = self.fim - self.ini
        if delta.days < 35:  # período é de um mês

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by radon

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct	Effect on CC	Reasoning
if	+1	An if statement is a single decision.
elif	+1	The elif statement adds another decision.
else	+0	The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for	+1	There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while	+1	There is a decision at the while statement.
except	+1	Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally	+0	The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with	+1	The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert	+1	The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension	+1	A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator	+1	Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_titulo_chefe. (6)
Open

    def get_titulo_chefe(self):
        titulo = ""
        casas_legislativas = self.casas_legislativas.all()
        for casa in casas_legislativas:
            esfera = casa.esfera

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by radon

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct	Effect on CC	Reasoning
if	+1	An if statement is a single decision.
elif	+1	The elif statement adds another decision.
else	+0	The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for	+1	There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while	+1	There is a decision at the while statement.
except	+1	Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally	+0	The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with	+1	The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert	+1	The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension	+1	A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator	+1	Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function `get_titulo_chefe` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_titulo_chefe(self):
        titulo = ""
        casas_legislativas = self.casas_legislativas.all()
        for casa in casas_legislativas:
            esfera = casa.esfera

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py - About 1 hr to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

See

MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

Remove this commented out code.
Open

        # if (voto == AUSENTE):

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by sonar-python

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

See

MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

Remove this commented out code.
Open

#       data_string = str(self.ini.year) # sempre começa com o ano

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by sonar-python

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

See

MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if data_final is not None:
            fim = parse_datetime('%s 0:0:0' % data_final)
            votacoes = votacoes.filter(data__lte=fim)

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix

Read up
Read up

radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py on lines 497..499

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 38.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 38.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Avoid extraneous whitespace in these situations:
- Immediately inside parentheses, brackets or braces.
- Immediately before a comma, semicolon, or colon.

Okay: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam( ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[ 1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[1], { eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2} )
E202: spam(ham[1 ], {eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2 })

E203: if x == 4: print x, y; x, y = y , x
E203: if x == 4: print x, y ; x, y = y, x
E203: if x == 4 : print x, y; x, y = y, x

Do not use bare 'except'
Open

        except:

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by pep8

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions when possible.

Okay: except Exception:
Okay: except BaseException:
E722: except:

Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
Open

class Partido(models.Model):

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by pep8

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Open

            'PODEMOS' : 'PODE'}

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by pep8

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Too many blank lines (3)
Open

class VotoPartido(VotosAgregados):

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by pep8

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

Invalid escape sequence '\i'
Open

            voto -- string \in {SIM, NAO, ABSTENCAO, AUSENTE, OBSTRUCAO}

Found in radar_parlamentar/modelagem/models.py by pep8

Read up
Read up
Exclude checks
- Disable engine
- Disable check

Invalid escape sequences are deprecated in Python 3.6.

Okay: regex = r'\.png$'
W605: regex = '\.png$'

radar-parlamentar/radar

Summary

Maintainability

Test Coverage

File models.py has 468 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_chefe_periodo. (10) Open

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __str__. (7) Open

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_titulo_chefe. (6) Open

Cyclomatic Complexity

Function get_titulo_chefe has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

Cognitive Complexity

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Further reading

Function get_chefe_periodo has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

Cognitive Complexity

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Further reading

Function __str__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

Cognitive Complexity

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Further reading

TODO found Open

TODO found Open

TODO found Open

Remove this commented out code. Open

See

Remove this commented out code. Open

See

Remove this commented out code. Open

See

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Whitespace before ':' Open

Do not use bare 'except' Open

Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent Open

Too many blank lines (3) Open

Invalid escape sequence '\i' Open

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category

Status

File `models.py` has 468 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_chefe_periodo. (10)
Open

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method str. (7)
Open

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_titulo_chefe. (6)
Open

Function `get_titulo_chefe` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Function `get_chefe_periodo` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Function `str` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

TODO found
Open

TODO found
Open

TODO found
Open

Remove this commented out code.
Open

Remove this commented out code.
Open

Remove this commented out code.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Whitespace before ':'
Open

Do not use bare 'except'
Open

Expected 2 blank lines, found 1
Open

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Open

Too many blank lines (3)
Open

Invalid escape sequence '\i'
Open