File schema_statements.rb
has 791 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module ActiveRecord
module ConnectionAdapters
module PostgreSQL
module SchemaStatements
# Drops the database specified on the +name+ attribute
Method reset_pk_sequence!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reset_pk_sequence!(table, pk = nil, sequence = nil) # :nodoc:
unless pk && sequence
default_pk, default_sequence = pk_and_sequence_for(table)
pk ||= default_pk
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method indexes
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def indexes(table_name) # :nodoc:
scope = quoted_scope(table_name)
result = query(<<~SQL, "SCHEMA")
SELECT distinct i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, pg_get_indexdef(d.indexrelid), t.oid,
Method indexes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def indexes(table_name) # :nodoc:
scope = quoted_scope(table_name)
result = query(<<~SQL, "SCHEMA")
SELECT distinct i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, pg_get_indexdef(d.indexrelid), t.oid,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pk_and_sequence_for
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pk_and_sequence_for(table) # :nodoc:
# First try looking for a sequence with a dependency on the
# given table's primary key.
result = query(<<~SQL, "SCHEMA")[0]
SELECT attr.attname, nsp.nspname, seq.relname
Method foreign_keys
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def foreign_keys(table_name)
scope = quoted_scope(table_name)
fk_info = internal_exec_query(<<~SQL, "SCHEMA", allow_retry: true, materialize_transactions: false)
SELECT t2.oid::regclass::text AS to_table, a1.attname AS column, a2.attname AS primary_key, c.conname AS name, c.confupdtype AS on_update, c.confdeltype AS on_delete, c.convalidated AS valid, c.condeferrable AS deferrable, c.condeferred AS deferred, c.conkey, c.confkey, c.conrelid, c.confrelid
FROM pg_constraint c
Method type_to_sql
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_to_sql(type, limit: nil, precision: nil, scale: nil, array: nil, enum_type: nil, **) # :nodoc:
sql = \
case type.to_s
when "binary"
# PostgreSQL doesn't support limits on binary (bytea) columns.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method type_to_sql
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_to_sql(type, limit: nil, precision: nil, scale: nil, array: nil, enum_type: nil, **) # :nodoc:
sql = \
case type.to_s
when "binary"
# PostgreSQL doesn't support limits on binary (bytea) columns.
Method remove_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_index(table_name, column_name = nil, **options) # :nodoc:
table = Utils.extract_schema_qualified_name(table_name.to_s)
if options.key?(:name)
provided_index = Utils.extract_schema_qualified_name(options[:name].to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method change_column_null
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change_column_null(table_name, column_name, null, default = nil) # :nodoc:
validate_change_column_null_argument!(null)
clear_cache!
unless null || default.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pk_and_sequence_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pk_and_sequence_for(table) # :nodoc:
# First try looking for a sequence with a dependency on the
# given table's primary key.
result = query(<<~SQL, "SCHEMA")[0]
SELECT attr.attname, nsp.nspname, seq.relname
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rename_table
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rename_table(table_name, new_name, **options)
validate_table_length!(new_name) unless options[:_uses_legacy_table_name]
clear_cache!
schema_cache.clear_data_source_cache!(table_name.to_s)
schema_cache.clear_data_source_cache!(new_name.to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"