activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

File core.rb has 460 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require "active_support/core_ext/enumerable"
require "active_support/core_ext/module/delegation"
require "active_support/parameter_filter"
require "concurrent/map"

Severity: Minor
Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

    Method find_by has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def find_by(*args) # :nodoc:
            return super if scope_attributes?
    
            hash = args.first
            return super unless Hash === hash
    Severity: Minor
    Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method find_by has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def find_by(*args) # :nodoc:
            return super if scope_attributes?
    
            hash = args.first
            return super unless Hash === hash
    Severity: Minor
    Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method pretty_print has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def pretty_print(pp)
            return super if custom_inspect_method_defined?
            pp.object_address_group(self) do
              if @attributes
                attr_names = attributes_for_inspect.select { |name| _has_attribute?(name.to_s) }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

                        if attribute == "id"
                          value.id_value
                        else
                          value.public_send(attribute)
                        end
      Severity: Major
      Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Method current_shard has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def self.current_shard
                connected_to_stack.reverse_each do |hash|
                  return hash[:shard] if hash[:shard] && hash[:klasses].include?(Base)
                  return hash[:shard] if hash[:shard] && hash[:klasses].include?(connection_class_for_self)
                end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method current_role has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def self.current_role
                connected_to_stack.reverse_each do |hash|
                  return hash[:role] if hash[:role] && hash[:klasses].include?(Base)
                  return hash[:role] if hash[:role] && hash[:klasses].include?(connection_class_for_self)
                end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method current_preventing_writes has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def self.current_preventing_writes
                connected_to_stack.reverse_each do |hash|
                  return hash[:prevent_writes] if !hash[:prevent_writes].nil? && hash[:klasses].include?(Base)
                  return hash[:prevent_writes] if !hash[:prevent_writes].nil? && hash[:klasses].include?(connection_class_for_self)
                end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method connection_class_for_self has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def self.connection_class_for_self # :nodoc:
                klass = self
        
                until klass == Base
                  break if klass.connection_class?
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method inherited has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                def inherited(subclass)
                  super
        
                  # initialize cache at class definition for thread safety
                  subclass.initialize_find_by_cache
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def self.current_role
                connected_to_stack.reverse_each do |hash|
                  return hash[:role] if hash[:role] && hash[:klasses].include?(Base)
                  return hash[:role] if hash[:role] && hash[:klasses].include?(connection_class_for_self)
                end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
        activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb on lines 164..170

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 37.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def self.current_shard
                connected_to_stack.reverse_each do |hash|
                  return hash[:shard] if hash[:shard] && hash[:klasses].include?(Base)
                  return hash[:shard] if hash[:shard] && hash[:klasses].include?(connection_class_for_self)
                end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
        activerecord/lib/active_record/core.rb on lines 146..152

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 37.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status