Method safe_constantize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def safe_constantize(camel_cased_word)
constantize(camel_cased_word)
rescue NameError => e
raise if e.name && !(camel_cased_word.to_s.split("::").include?(e.name.to_s) ||
e.name.to_s == camel_cased_word.to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method camelize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def camelize(term, uppercase_first_letter = true)
string = term.to_s
# String#camelize takes a symbol (:upper or :lower), so here we also support :lower to keep the methods consistent.
if !uppercase_first_letter || uppercase_first_letter == :lower
string = string.sub(inflections.acronyms_camelize_regex) { |match| match.downcase! || match }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method humanize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def humanize(lower_case_and_underscored_word, capitalize: true, keep_id_suffix: false)
result = lower_case_and_underscored_word.to_s.dup
inflections.humans.each { |(rule, replacement)| break if result.sub!(rule, replacement) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method apply_inflections
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply_inflections(word, rules, locale = :en)
result = word.to_s.dup
if word.empty? || inflections(locale).uncountables.uncountable?(result)
result
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"