Showing 126 of 126 total issues
Function when
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
when: function( subordinate /* , ..., subordinateN */ ) {
var i = 0,
resolveValues = slice.call( arguments ),
length = resolveValues.length,
Function dispatch
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dispatch: function( event ) {
// Make a writable jQuery.Event from the native event object
event = jQuery.event.fix( event );
Function access
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var access = jQuery.access = function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) {
var i = 0,
len = elems.length,
bulk = key == null;
Function showHide
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function showHide( elements, show ) {
var display, elem, hidden,
values = [],
index = 0,
length = elements.length;
Function setOffset
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setOffset: function( elem, options, i ) {
var curPosition, curLeft, curCSSTop, curTop, curOffset, curCSSLeft, calculatePosition,
position = jQuery.css( elem, "position" ),
curElem = jQuery( elem ),
props = {};
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( start && start[ 3 ] !== unit ) {
// Trust units reported by jQuery.css
unit = unit || start[ 3 ];
// Make sure we update the tween properties later on
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if ( useCache && (cache = (elem[ expando ] || (elem[ expando ] = {}))[ type ]) && cache[0] === dirruns ) {
diff = cache[1];
// xml :nth-child(...) or :nth-last-child(...) or :nth(-last)?-of-type(...)
} else {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).addClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).removeClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function addClass
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addClass: function( value ) {
var classes, elem, cur, clazz, j, finalValue,
proceed = typeof value === "string" && value,
i = 0,
len = this.length;
Function style
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
style: function( elem, name, value, extra ) {
// Don't set styles on text and comment nodes
if ( !elem || elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 || !elem.style ) {
return;
Function removeClass
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeClass: function( value ) {
var classes, elem, cur, clazz, j, finalValue,
proceed = arguments.length === 0 || typeof value === "string" && value,
i = 0,
len = this.length;
Function load
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.load = function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
}
Function attr
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value ) {
var hooks, ret,
nType = elem.nodeType;
// don't get/set attributes on text, comment and attribute nodes
Function handlers
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handlers: function( event, handlers ) {
var i, matches, sel, handleObj,
handlerQueue = [],
delegateCount = handlers.delegateCount,
cur = event.target;
Function toggleClass
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
toggleClass: function( value, stateVal ) {
var type = typeof value;
if ( typeof stateVal === "boolean" && type === "string" ) {
return stateVal ? this.addClass( value ) : this.removeClass( value );
Function finish
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
finish: function( type ) {
if ( type !== false ) {
type = type || "fx";
}
return this.each(function() {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preventDefault: function() {
var e = this.originalEvent;
this.isDefaultPrevented = returnTrue;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
stopPropagation: function() {
var e = this.originalEvent;
this.isPropagationStopped = returnTrue;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function preventSpam
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function preventSpam()
{
$ip = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
$blacklistfile = __DIR__ . '/../blacklist/' . $ip;
$count = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"