Sign upLogin

rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 7,361 of 22,177 total issues

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    #return str
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    #return str
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    #return str
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)

    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    #return str
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb on lines 101..110
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 20 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def n_obfu(str)
    result = ""
    str.scan(/./u) do |c|
      if rand(2) == 0 and c.upcase >= 'A' and c.upcase <= 'Z'
        result << "#%x" % c.unpack("C*")[0]
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_pdf_embedded_exe_nojs.rb and 19 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
modules/auxiliary/pdf/foxit/authbypass.rb on lines 50..59
modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshcont.rb on lines 190..200
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 363..373
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 259..268
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 133..142
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_geticon.rb on lines 144..153
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 159..168
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 191..201
modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 123..132
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_collectemailinfo.rb on lines 117..126
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_cooltype_sing.rb on lines 350..360
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_button.rb on lines 265..274
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flashplayer_newfunction.rb on lines 261..270
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_flatedecode_predictor02.rb on lines 128..137
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_libtiff.rb on lines 121..130
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_media_newplayer.rb on lines 160..169
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_toolbutton.rb on lines 200..210
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_u3d_meshdecl.rb on lines 268..278
modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/adobe_utilprintf.rb on lines 114..123

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function( 'CreateNamedPipeW', 'DWORD',[
      ["PWCHAR","lpName","in"],
      ["DWORD","dwOpenMode","in"],
      ["DWORD","dwPipeMode","in"],
      ["DWORD","nMaxInstances","in"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function('WSAJoinLeaf', 'DWORD',[
      ["DWORD","s","in"],
      ["PBLOB","name","in"],
      ["DWORD","namelen","in"],
      ["PBLOB","lpCallerData","in"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function( 'DeviceIoControl', 'BOOL',[
      ["HANDLE","hDevice","in"],
      ["DWORD","dwIoControlCode","in"],
      ["PBLOB","lpInBuffer","in"],
      ["DWORD","nInBufferSize","in"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function('RegEnumKeyExW', 'DWORD',[
      ["DWORD","hKey","in"],
      ["DWORD","dwIndex","in"],
      ["PWCHAR","lpName","out"],
      ["PDWORD","lpcchName","inout"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function('CreatePrivateObjectSecurityEx', 'BOOL',[
      ["PBLOB","ParentDescriptor","in"],
      ["PBLOB","CreatorDescriptor","in"],
      ["PBLOB","NewDescriptor","out"],
      ["PBLOB","ObjectType","in"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function('NetUserEnum', 'DWORD', [
      ["PWCHAR","servername","in"],
      ["DWORD","level","in"],
      ["DWORD","filter","in"],
      ["PLPVOID","bufptr","out"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function('PrivateExtractIconsW', 'DWORD',[
      ["PWCHAR","szFileName","in"],
      ["DWORD","nIconIndex","in"],
      ["DWORD","cxIcon","in"],
      ["DWORD","cyIcon","in"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2958..2967
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 25 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    dll.add_function('TabbedTextOutA', 'DWORD',[
      ["DWORD","hdc","in"],
      ["DWORD","x","in"],
      ["DWORD","y","in"],
      ["PCHAR","lpString","in"],
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb and 24 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 310..319
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 321..330
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 565..574
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 576..585
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 594..603
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 605..614
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 903..912
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_advapi32.rb on lines 1299..1308
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 440..449
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 451..460
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 659..668
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1908..1917
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 1919..1928
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_kernel32.rb on lines 2661..2670
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 28..37
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 71..80
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_netapi32.rb on lines 82..91
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 595..604
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2317..2326
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2328..2337
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2480..2489
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_user32.rb on lines 2969..2978
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 262..271
lib/rex/post/meterpreter/extensions/stdapi/railgun/def/windows/def_ws2_32.rb on lines 303..312

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language